Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Question


  • 14 months ago · Quote · #1

    hankas

    Hello,

    I came across this position from Peter Svidler vs Alexei Shirov's game.

    Houdini 2.0b's recommended move was 21.b3, and the move was evaluated as +0.16.

    Interesting, Svidler made a better move than Houdini. Svidler did 21.Rxc8 and Houdini evaluated Svidler's move as +0.27, which is better than Houdini's original suggestion.

    After looking at the position, I still don't understand the reason behind Svidler's Rxc8. Does anybody has insight behind this super GM's move?

    Thanks.

  • 14 months ago · Quote · #2

    hankas

    Here is the complete game.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #3

    ratatouie

    hankas duudddeeee, send me some tactics puzzles.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #4

    ratatouie

    hakas why am i getting so bad

     all of a sudden?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #5

    MDOC777

    I'm using Houdini_15_w32 and I'm getting recommended 21.Rxc8 with a value of +0.27.  As for the move itself, I haven't analyzed it; it's late now.  zzzz

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #6

    hankas

    @ratatouie: There is a tactics trainer at chess.com. Please help me conserve my grey matter.   Innocent

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #7

    ratatouie

    hakas, so what is ur question.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #8

    AndyClifton

    Better yet, why are you using ratatouie's traditional titling format to ask it?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #9

    hankas

    AndyClifton wrote:

    Better yet, why are you using ratatouie's traditional titling format to ask it?

    Lol.

    I am telling you the guy is a trendsetter. Soon everybody will start posting like this:

    hello hankas here how's everybody doing i just drop by to say hello cheerios hankas out

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #10

    NachtWulf

    yo dawg, I herd u liek- okay, can't think of a good meme. Nevermind.

    To answer the OP, I guess we could solve this by assuming the move was correct, then thinking backwards.

    The most likely reason white exchanged rooks would be that white wants to prevent black from doing the same. The difference it makes is that white's queen would get to stay in the same spot instead of having to recapture where the rook was. As a result, white would be giving up control of the c-file, and gaining more control of different diagonals.

    Most of white's pieces seem to be heading towards the kingside, so it doesn't look like the c-file affects white's plans as much. More importantly, white's bishop already controls the dark diagonal, so a queen might only get in the way. Finally, I think the reason has to do with white's a and b pawns. A rook exchange forces black to recapture with the queen or bishop. (Note that if black takes with rook, white wins a pawn with dxe5. Currently, the rook is defending e5 with the threat of a revealed attack using the bishop.) In the given position, both queen and bishop are guarding white's b-pawn, thus a rook exchange essentially gives white a bit of indirect control over that pawn.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #11

    shepi13

    Nachtwulf - the queen is defending the pawn though - what I'm wondering is why black played Bxc8 instead of Rxc8. If Svidler knew black would play Bxc8, of course he would play Rxc8 in an instant. It prevents a rook from getting to the c file for a few moves, removes defense from the b pawn, and most importantly prevents Rxc1 Qxc1 Rc8 with tempo.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #12

    NachtWulf

    I missed the fact that black's queen is currently defending e5. Previously, I had thought that the rook had to stay there to guard the pawn, but clearly that is not the case. Just roughly looking at the resulting position, if black recaptured with the rook, white would be controlling the central files, while black would be controlling files to the side. I obviously don't play anywhere near the level of the players involved, but that would be my best guess.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #13

    hankas

    shepi13 wrote:

    Nachtwulf - the queen is defending the pawn though - what I'm wondering is why black played Bxc8 instead of Rxc8. If Svidler knew black would play Bxc8, of course he would play Rxc8 in an instant. It prevents a rook from getting to the c file for a few moves, removes defense from the b pawn, and most importantly prevents Rxc1 Qxc1 Rc8 with tempo.

    My guess is that black wanted to move his bishop to b7, but that plan was prevented when white replied with Bd3 threatening the pawn at b5.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #14

    NachtWulf

    Why didn't black ever play Nc4?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #15

    shepi13

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 13 months ago · Quote · #16

    shepi13

    And no one comment here on the game as it is not finished. I just wanted to show the idea.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #17

    shepi13

    I decided to delete the game I posted so I don't get accused of cheating.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #18

    JG27Pyth

    Rxc8 is baffling, Bxc8 even more so... neither GM seems to think the open c -file is worth fighting for. I have no insight except to say, -- I don't get it, but I'll bet they're doing it right.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #19

    shepi13

    With a bishop on b1 there is no way for a rook to penetrate, and didn't nimzowitz say that an open file doesn't matter if the rooks can't penetrate. Rxc8 looks better anyways because it controls c4, an outpost for the knight. I still don't understand.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #20

    AndyClifton

    I actually spent quite a bit of time looking at this position.  My assumption was that there would be some way to take advantage of the bishop's position after 21... Rxc8 22 de de...but I couldn't really find anything.


Back to Top

Post your reply: