16276 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
A common situation.
Is it generally worth it for Black to swap the R + P, giving up his N and B? That's equivalent points (5+1 for 3+3), and weakens White's castled king. But in exchange, Black has given up two mobile pieces to take out a single immobile Rook.
Nope, the two pieces are generally much better. A more equal trade is a minor piece, a pawn, and a positional advantage for a rook. The numbers are relative, and not applicable here.
Check out the "Dilworth Variation"; the Russians infused new life into it to bolster Black`s chances.
Generally the two pieces coordinate better than the rook and pawn. Even in the endgame where the mobility of both sides is greatly increased. In the specific situation you posted I don't think any strong player would even consider it.
Think of it this way, if you were in the endgame and the position was as follows:
5 pawns (3 on the kingside, 2 on the queenside)
R + B + N
5pawns (3 on the kingside, 2 on the queenside)
In general most players would agree that the exchange you are suggesting would negate Black's material advantage. N + B will outmanouver a lone R in almost all positions.
Only under exceptional circumstances where tactics would make possible, the queening of a Black pawn impossible to stop, or an unstoppable mating net, or an exchange to set up a draw through a perpetual check or stalemate if you are about to be mated or if White is about to queen a pawn by force in order to force a 3 move repetition or perpetual check or a stalemate.
Chess Is Garbage, Here Are My Own Openings
by harryhirsch2000 a few minutes ago
Could chess.com improve computer anylizing?
by CP6033 a few minutes ago
Mate in 4 - Forced - From Blitz Game
by caveatcanis 2 minutes ago
Breaking the 1600 barrier (first Danish Gambit)
by badger_song 2 minutes ago
by DelCheMethod 3 minutes ago
Borislav Ivanov is Back! (AGAIN!!)
by GeorgeBlackChess123 3 minutes ago
London Chess Classic - Super 16 Rapid 2013
by trysts 4 minutes ago
Can chess players have bad days?
by Ubik42 6 minutes ago
Can I buy a membership as a gift?
by suni2002 6 minutes ago
First win against phone app
by CP6033 7 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!