Hey peeps, just finished a game which I was finding quite fun, had a few plans going on in my head, when my opponent resigned and I couldn't fully comprehend why... is my opponent's position here hopeless, or did they resign too early? Clever people's opinions needed... the very fact I don't fully understand the reason they resigned indicates to me it was perhaps too soon! :D
I'm not sure how white could have prevented one of black's queenside pawns from promoting. White's doing a decent job tying up black's rook and knight, but if white's queen moves, then the knight is lost. If white trades the knight for the bishop ex. 22.Nxd6 Bxd6 23.Qxd6, that frees the rook and the back rank knight to escort a pawn to the queening square. If white starts moving the knigside pawns, black simply moves his passed pawn to c3, c2 etc. It seems to me the queen is too overloaded to mount any kind of effective attack.
there is no way white can win. u can just keep advancing ur c pawn and/or start another pawn advance with ur a or b pawn... if he tries to get his Queen into play, take his knight (of course if the Queen doesnt protect it)...
he cannot stop the pawn charge!!
HOWEVER, some ppl like to resign early and some ppl dont... i NEVER do as i like to play for stalemate or time... i once got a ridicilous stalemate in reality... my King vs Queen, rook, bishop and pawns!!
Thanks for all your input, my plan was to push the pawn, but I wasn't totally convinced it would be a done deal, maybe I was over-estimating the queen's strength (and after having been so happy to swap mine for two rooks too!)
I wouldn't have resigned in their position, but maybe thats because I can't think that far ahead
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ