This game I have played against a little chess program that I have. I must say that I am very proud of this game. Even more becouse I studied this variation only couple of days. I would like some coments and suggestions for this game, please. Thanks.

First things first. The opening is more commenly known as the Sveshnikov rather than Lasker variation. You also misspelled Sveshnikov.

On to commentary about the game....

10...Nf5 was fine, but did you look at either b5 or Qa5+?

21...Ba6? Rather than continue with the kingside attack you exhange and waste a tempo bringing your rook back? You should look into Rb8 or Ng6.

22...Nf5 wasn't too bad, but did you look at what you could have started with f3?

I used a computer to help with analysis. I also stopped my analysis at move 35 where you were up material and had a winning endgame. Computers tend to not be great at analysis of endgames.

thanks for coments. Sorry about spelling I learned english from movies mostly. In my books says it's lasker variation...And about moves; ...10. Qa5 it would play c3 and make space for his Knight, and b5 is nice move but i wanted to castle as soon as posibile. ...21. Ng6 I prefered my move i played becouse of my next moveand ...21. Rb8 was good, but I wanted to exchange Bishops. mY 21st move was toughest for me to decide what to play. Anyway thanks for the coments and suggestions...

---

Could you elaborate on that, please?