7259 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
ndrw
I moved Qc2 because if my opponent had taken his bishop to e4, he would have forked my knights. How can the suggested 6.a4 move be better than guarding the e4 square?
Loomis
The problem with Qc2 is that you have weaknesses along the a8-h1 diagonal. Your knight on c3 is now completely unguarded. If your opponent had responded to Qc2 with Nf6 your e4 pawn is still in danger and because of your move Qc2 it is now pinned. So, Qe2 would have been a better choice. The move a4 chooses to counterattack rather than protect. Trading the e4 pawn for theĀ b5 pawn might be ok here because it weakens the c4 pawn.
''Gift from Viswanathan Anand''
by kyska00 a few minutes ago
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by jetfighter13 a few minutes ago
My game against GM Michael Adams
by Firepower8 4 minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by chessblood 7 minutes ago
CPOTM May 2012 cont.
by proKnight98 9 minutes ago
Super inexpensive coaching
by ciljettu 11 minutes ago
mate
by piphilologist 11 minutes ago
Deep Fritz 13
by VladBGhita 13 minutes ago
Chess-specific intelligence VS General intelligence
by PLAVIN79 20 minutes ago
Smith-Morra defence
by ghostofmaroczy 23 minutes ago