10961 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hello everyone, this is a game that I played recently in which I sacked the queen for what I thought was a dangerous attack. The time controls were 4/0 and I ended up winning but I couldn't find an immediate win and felt i was lucky to receive some inaccurate play from my opponent. I would appreciate any thoughts or analysis. Specifically, do you think this sacrifice was sound?
Yes, your move was perfectly sound. But it really depends on the follow up. Did Black take the queen and if so, which pawn did you capture in reply? 17. gxf6 or 17. gxh6? But I agree this would be very hard to see otb at the 1500 level.
Thanks for the reply. The game continued 16. Nxc4 17. gxf6 but I couldn't find a decisive continuation and ended up playing a few blunders. Luckily, my opponent did as well.
Well, I like to say that any sacrifice that works is sound. But I also play the bongcloud...
Well, I like to say that any sacrifice that works is sound.
Best you could get is a pawn and to bishops for the queen. But in a 4 min game it clearly worked!
Disagree with this evaluation. Black's king is toast. White will soon have two bishops and a rook breathing fire down his neck.
@celticliberal, No, we don't. there are kids on this site.
yes, i'm talking to you, in the post right below me.
I'm dying of laughter
thank you @dike93 and the other guy. we need more people like u
I sent a report g-man15....hopefully these type of people will be kciked out soon from this site. :)
@g-man15 that was just so funny though
Stockfish confirms the sack was totally sound and taking the queen is basically a losing move. However, the queen can be declined, and Qc2 was objectively a somewhat stronger move (not by a huge amount though). In terms of a blitz game though, *&^! yeah, cool move.
It takes less chess-balls to sac a queen (unforced) in a quicky. The sac is dubious ( to say the least) , but still : both me and Tal are pleased.
Like Confusion said : .......... your move. Tik-tak Tik-tak
Correlation between chess and atheism.
by ChastityMoon 15 minutes ago
5/22/2015 - Surya Ganguly - Emanuel Berg , Gibraltar, 2009
by mri10 21 minutes ago
Who Ever Invented Chess Made A Mistake
by RedDawn430 25 minutes ago
Does ...Na5 refute the Yugoslav Attack?
by hayabusahayate16 35 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Irinasdaddy 42 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by Synaphai 48 minutes ago
A pretty finish to a bullet game
by kevinkt 48 minutes ago
by kco 49 minutes ago
If you could change one rule of chess,what would it be?
by owltuna 51 minutes ago
Scandinavian Defense 1. e4 d5 2. Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8!!
by Conzipe 59 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!