7259 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
joeygaga
chessmagic5
Study games of Wesley So. He likes to play these positions in his early games.
What's your defence against 1.e4 as black? If Sicilian Dragon then you should bookmark these materials: CLICK HERE
DjMeredith
I'm not one for trading the bishop + Knight for Rook + Pawn although i have played this, I Feel as though it gives black the advantage. I think you got lucky with the win, But good game anyway.
I wouldn't say it was lucky, my opponent made a mistake, the same way that I made a mistake earlier in the game. Calling wins lucky is kind of evasive - doesn't really address who played good or bad and when. Thanks for the comment and for the compliment, though... I still wonder about the B+K for R+P trade.
princejher
there are principles and rules governing an exchange or trade of materials. some of them are subjective to the players involved in the given position, while most of it are objective and should not be broken! In your given situation, i agree that the trade is purely on your personal preference because in higer rated matches, those players try to maintain the tension in the board as long as they can while maneuvering around that tension to gain the advantage. judging your exchange strategy for 2 minor pieces vs. rook+pawn is not good when you play a higher rated player who knows a lot of piece coordination rather than just counting the equivalent points in a given exchange of materials!
princejher - I understand that players shouldn't exchange pieces while only considering points. My question about this exchange is whether the disruption of black's kingside is worth black's more active piece play. I'd like to see examples of games featuring this exchange that are fully played out (unlike the game here, which ended because of a blunder).
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by The_Gavinator a few minutes ago
''Gift from Viswanathan Anand''
by kyska00 a few minutes ago
My game against GM Michael Adams
by Firepower8 4 minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by chessblood 8 minutes ago
CPOTM May 2012 cont.
by proKnight98 10 minutes ago
Super inexpensive coaching
by ciljettu 11 minutes ago
mate
by piphilologist 12 minutes ago
Deep Fritz 13
by VladBGhita 14 minutes ago
Chess-specific intelligence VS General intelligence
by PLAVIN79 21 minutes ago
Smith-Morra defence
by ghostofmaroczy 23 minutes ago