Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Stonewall Attack from 1908

Jump to forum:
 
26th October 2009, 07:03am
#1
by RetGuvvie98
WinterHaven now - for a while United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 9384

Alexey Alekhine vs Andreas Duhm, correspondence 1908-09   (Alexey was Alexander Alekhine's older brother).

 

 

26th October 2009, 04:30pm
#2
by Joe_Blob
Boa Vista, Roraima Brazil
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 3673

Very nice!

18th February 2010, 05:13pm
#3
by raymond_grc
harling texas United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 36

lol it does look like he is throwing pieces at the king

1st November 2010, 09:10am
#4
by jbpchess
Butte United States
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 77

wow that is a very strong attack but, how could black play a better defence?

1st November 2010, 10:25am
#5
by BenTal
Herts United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 483

Running through the game (and checking some options with a PC), it looks as though taking the bishop with 19... gxBf5 was a crucial error (Ng8 being suggested by the software as the best alternative). Also, h5 or h6 earlier on would have helped defend the kingside.

6th November 2010, 04:58am
#6
by restinpeace
Auckland New Zealand
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 584

That's why Alekhine is a force to reckon with at his prime. A talented player, vicious attacker, crazy sacrificer and overall best position of Chess pieces. This game is an example of those. Nice!

30th October 2011, 01:28am
#7
by simplysquare22
California United States
Member Since: Dec 2010
Member Points: 126

Took me a bit to see why it was a treat after 22.Qe3, and then finally saw white's DSB finishes off black's king.  What a shame to be betrayed by your own men...

15th December 2011, 07:00pm
#8
by DENVERHIGH
Northern California United States
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 1631

.

16th December 2011, 02:14am
#9
by RetGuvvie98
WinterHaven now - for a while United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 9384

denver, please specify the game and a move you are asking about with that question.

until it gets 'into context' of where you were looking when you asked it, no one can intelligently respond. (at least, not me).

16th December 2011, 08:04am
#10
by DENVERHIGH
Northern California United States
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 1631
.
16th December 2011, 02:00pm
#11
by RetGuvvie98
WinterHaven now - for a while United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 9384

ahhh excuse me for not realizing what you meant by the way you said it.

You ask:

Why did he resign?     he was in check and didn't have a good move.

Was he going to get mated?    yes, eventually.or sooner if he tried to hang onto material.

Was he going to lose too much material?     yes.  work out how.

What was the supposed continuation?     what do you see for white, given that black is in check and must defend his king or move it?

 

regards, 

16th December 2011, 03:24pm
#12
by IM pfren
Santorini Greece
Member Since: Jul 2011
Member Points: 1018

Black played very poorly. He should challenge white's setup early, e.g. 6...Qc7!? which "threatens" to take on d4, and White has to retake with the c-pawn, or sacrifice the f4-pawn.

And of course Black should not be in a hurry to castle short, or commit his dark squared bishop- which may work better from g7, since a pawn on g6 restricts the d3 bishop.

Actually I think white's position in that sort-of-attack is too static- I'd rather be Black after white's sixth (6.Ngf3 with a regular Colle is a more chessic option).

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.