^ Click here to remove ads! ^

stormy weather

Jump to forum:
 
11th February 2008, 03:22am
#1
by hicetnunc
Neuilly-sur-Seine France
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 397

Hello guys, here is an entertaining game I played and lost yesterday in the French league against a young opponent. I think it has some instructional value and is quite entertaining too.

Comments and analysis are of course very much welcome Smile

 


11th February 2008, 05:41am
#2
by Kingfisher
zagreb Croatia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1171

Sorry, I'm not as highly rated as you, but your alternate 20... Kg6 line seems to end in white's blunder.

24.Rf5+?! Nxf5 Qxf5+ Kh6 Qxc5 Rxc8 and white loses a B and R for a N and B.

 

 


11th February 2008, 05:44am
#3
by hicetnunc
Neuilly-sur-Seine France
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 397
Kingfisher wrote:

Sorry, I'm not as highly rated as you, but your alternate 20... Kg6 line seems to end in white's blunder.

24.Rf5+?! Nxf5 Qxf5+ Kh6 Qxc5 Rxc8 and white loses a B and R for a N and B.

 

 


 instead of Qxc5, Ng4# does the trick Smile


11th February 2008, 02:36pm
#4
by lubo
Sofia Bulgaria
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 230

Why not 4. ... Bd6?

What about 11. ... Qxb3 12. Bxb3 de.. white still have some advantage but it's not that bad.

 


11th February 2008, 02:50pm
#5
by hicetnunc
Neuilly-sur-Seine France
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 397

4...Bd6 might be playable too, white can play either 5.Nf3 or 5.Qb3 - probably black will play f6 after Bd6 anyway

As for 11...Qxb3 12.Bxb3 fxe, white can reply 13.fxe with threat Nf7, so probably 13...Nf6 14.0-0 or 14.Nf7 anyway - might be better than what I played, yes Smile


12th February 2008, 01:04am
#6
by NM tonydal
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 948
Interesting game.
12th February 2008, 04:41am
#7
by Smartattack
Portugal
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 539
Quite an unnusual game, what opening is that?i ll review this game carefully.
12th February 2008, 11:40am
#8
by Fresh
Beantown United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 91
I am a litte confused.  You knew he was coming hard Queenside, and yet you didn't develop your pieces until your Queen on move 6.  It seems like your Knights would prosper under such closed position.  Furthermore, if you lock up the queen side, you know you can't get knocked out quickly and shouldn't be able to get trapped.  I guess I am confused as to why you starting trading pieces when he had more development and iniative.
12th February 2008, 01:47pm
#9
by hicetnunc
Neuilly-sur-Seine France
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 397

=> Fresh - You're right : I didn't develop my pieces because I was trying to seize the center, but it's a dangerous strategy, as the game shows Smile

As for locking the queenside, you're right again : bxa3 was a major mistake (maybe the losing mistake actually).


12th February 2008, 02:08pm
#10
by SteveM
Baldwin United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 108
I agree with Fresh.  Of course, I don't know how I would have reacted to that opening myself (my rating isn't anywhere near yours); it's quite unique!
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.