17818 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'd read a thread recently about a sacrifice on h7 that wasn't sound, and eventually led to a loss for White. Now, I do premature sacrifices on h7 all the time, provided that several conditions are met. In the above game, Black could have coordinated his opening at least a little better than he could have (especially with the first 4 moves), but this is just a general idea of what to look out for with the h7 attack.
I'd also like a little analysis for if Black does not take the bishop. I'd like to think there are more chances for Black than what I had seen, and would like to see how much of a defense Black can put up.
I also talked about playing e5 with a buddy of mine, and he says that d5 is played much more often, to open up the position and eventually go into an endgame. For the h7 attack, I view e5 as intergral to the attack, and must be played in order for the attack to have a sure chance of success. Against average players, I suspect this works quite well. But what about the experts?
Edit: Added a line I overlooked involving f6.
In your game the sacrifice was sound, but only because of your opponent's bad defensive moves. Usually it isn't so clear what will happen. Nice game anyway.
Forgot that bit.
And yes, I agree that Black made a hash out of the opening, but the primary pieces are there. White has the optimal setup for the attack; Black's dark squared Bishop is on b4 and not on e7, Black's knight is not on f6, and his white squared bishop and queenside knight usually have no direct access to the kingside by the time White begins the attack.
Great attack. Why is the greek gift the only attack mentioned from the book The Art of Attack? Are there several others?
This is the most common attack, and probably the easiest one to setup. I'm sure there's a similar setup for people that castle queenside, but I rarely see anyone that does it, myself included.
I never actually read a book to learn this attack, that's how common it is.
The game also could have contined like...
My best attacks on castled kings
by newengland7 a few minutes ago
10/4/2015 - Forced Mate
by Bax24cuz 4 minutes ago
White's First-Move Advantage
by NativeChessMinerals 4 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by Krenzinator 7 minutes ago
Why are women not as successful as men in chess?
by itchymescratch 7 minutes ago
winning computer hard 3|2 in the Bird (game collection)
by pdela 10 minutes ago
by Sqod 12 minutes ago
Soviet Cheating in FIDE Competition: Keres-Botvinnik, 1948, Pt 3
by SmyslovFan 12 minutes ago
Any Good Books on This?
by ylblai2 27 minutes ago
King horse crushes opposition
by Sqod 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!