12585 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is a recent OTB league game I played as white - 1hr 30mins each time controls.
We are both rated around 1800 at moment. As some of you may have guessed by the thread title I played the London System :)
What I would like some help understanding after 11.Re1 white seems to have almost everything he could dream for, yet when I ran game through engine (houdini) white only has small advantage and throughout the whole game - although I was always mostly slightly better, and mostly making the engines top 3/4 move choices (more often than my opponent) there were no tactical busts which seems strange as if i'm making what the engine thinks are good moves with no blunders I would have thought I would have out played him at some point and created some winning tactics - there just didn't seem to be anything.
The only thing that came out of the game in my favour was I had 35 mins left to my opponents 2mins in the end and he started to blunder and lost on time.
My question is, is this symptom of playing a passive openign or lack of technique - or both :) Your comments appreciated.
You thought you were much better... why? "White has everything he could dream for" like what? The e4 break? You play it, exchanges happen, and the aftermath is you have the e5 square and... and what? Black has the active idea of breaking up your queenside pawns. I mean it's probably just equal but white has nothing special to undertake. 18...b4 makes the most sense and black gets a small amount of play.
In the game nothing really happened, there were some more trades, an endgame, and then black, somewhat hilariously to me, replaces his king with his rook for passive defense (this operation is completely backwards) and as punishment loses the game.
So a little bit of reading the pawn structure and knowing some basic endgame ideas (or just the relative value of the pieces, rook > king) would have gone a long way for black.
Anyway, that's my impression of the game. Not sure what you're asking. If you were up 30 minutes I guess black felt uncomfortable in the position and was taking a lot of time trying to figure it out (?)
Thanks, your probably right, I got my little setup at move 11 and expected more than was there.. I need more tactics I think I get bored in these positions..
What you should be asking is what did black do to deserve to be clearly worse and the answer as I see it is nothing. He made reasonable moves. I can easily see Houdini's assessment. You make your e4 break and you have a little more space, maybe he has slightly worse weaknesses.
Very basic study guide to hit 2000
by pianopenguin615 a few minutes ago
11/28/2014 - Inch By Inch
by Yizrael a few minutes ago
Kings Gambit: Theory
by lolurspammed a few minutes ago
jazz it up
by RonaldJosephCote 3 minutes ago
sexism in chess?
by uwinagain 3 minutes ago
by owltuna 3 minutes ago
11/16/2014 - Mate in 3
by dingjia 8 minutes ago
by Syd_Arthur 9 minutes ago
why isn't botvinnik talked about as much
by DrCheckevertim 13 minutes ago
Adding weight to pieces
by LuftWaffles 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!