11403 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I decided to join a tournament on the online chess options; 1 day move time. And recently have lost 2 of the games against the same theme/tactic. So as this theme is totaly new for me (nothing like that in the tactic training pluzes I have being doing) I decided to post the games for people to comment, see how this sacrifice of Knight works, and the ones that have not seeing it can learn from my mistakes.
I apreciate feedback, and advice in how to improve my game.
in the first game your knight adventure to capture a single pawn on b7 is very wrong. you should develop a better sense of danger. you can not care about capturing a single pawn when your king is under fire. I was expecting a crushing attack from black anytime after about move 15. after you opened the f-file by capturing the pawn on e4 i was expecting a sudden death. black took sometime before throwing the crushing blow, i believe black had something very before.
i don't like black's 24...Qxe5. he should have played Nxe5 bringing more pieces into the attack.
This article might help you with basic checkmating patterns
Ok, I just created a post that didn't show up... It was all great and fun and had all the best stuff.... But now I am just tired, and wanna go play computer games (that is chess on internet).
Anyway saying I appreciate the feedback, still have lots to learn, thanks for the link, I think the adventure to gaing a pawn was justify, that was not the problem, the problem was I was no aware of the combination atack my oponent had.
Anybody else thing that is not good to go after a pawn like that? I mean in a position where your king is safe.
if your king is safe then it might be okay to go after pawns, but its usually better to combine it with some other plans. it depends on the position. to quote kasparov, there are three major elements of any chess position. material (obvious), quality of material and time. there are many poisoned pawn variations where the side grabbing the pawn loses time and quality of material. for the same reason gambits work.
3/4/2015 - Boxed In
by PuzzlePlayer a few minutes ago
Chess rating system
by Jion_Wansu 5 minutes ago
If you could change one rule of chess,what would it be?
by owltuna 9 minutes ago
by JackTupp 22 minutes ago
PGN to fen
by HGMuller 50 minutes ago
Invites that are not relevant to me!
by baddogno 65 minutes ago
Manual of Chess Combinations, Vol. 1A , 1B , 2 and, 3
by jarrasch 95 minutes ago
by campana1 96 minutes ago
andriod app update pushed out yesterday
by fabiotabs 102 minutes ago
3/3/2015 - Mate in 3
by Warhorse50337 102 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!