13545 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I would like some help in analyzing where i went wrong with this game. I was trying to find a mate somewhere, so I just kept putting my opponent in check. After awhile, I couldn't find it, and ended up losing. Does somebody see one somwhere?
Forced checkmate is really hard to come by in the middlegame. I don't see a checkmate after 3...Ke7, but I do see ways to win material and attain a comfortable position, (verybadbishop posted the best continuation) which is all you usually need to win anyway. I rarely get stylish checkmates involving sacrifices, 'cause I don't sacifice pieces unless I know for sure it's worth it.
I was analyzing your game, and noticed after way too long that you could have swapped his queen for your rook many times, but you instead tried to go directly for checkmate. Case in point.
After 8....Kb5 the best chance of a mate is 9.Bd3+ (instead of 9.a4+)
yere30 after 1.Bd3+ Qxd3 is best for black, black can last longer.
kco, you are indeed correct in saying that "Black can last longer".
But you are wrong, kco, because the premise of this thread is-----
"There had to have been a mate somewhere..."
Unless you can show that 1...Qxd3 does not lead to a mate.
yes it does, plug in your computer and you'll see.
The premise of this thread is "There had to have been a mate somewhere..."
So there is a mate shown in your computer after 1....Qxd3. That's good, kco.That's splendid.
But do show us the mate after 1....Qxd3.
if u need tech. for chess help.....u learn little.(Bicarbonatofsoda position), re1+,kd7,rxb+,kc8,rxq+,rxr.qxap+,rb7, pc6
......Guys, the point I think he's making is that winning the opponent's queen leads to checkmate, but It takes many moves to do so, as is usually the case when you go up material. Thus, you need a computer to find the very fastest checkmate.
Computer analysis indeed shows mate at some points. But at an earlier stage some, easy to find, good moves where missed which would have lead to a win without the need to find a (more difficult to find) mate.
I think more important is to understand that 4.Rfe1+ simply wins, whether you manage to calculate the mate at that point or not.
And earlier 3.Bxg6 is the natural move, attacking both f7 and Bd5.
i can relate to this player. He feels like mate is near and smells blood. Love the feeling of winning by mate.
mod: please watch your language
If the moves that lead to mate exceed the moves that lead to resignation, which is more efficient? I suspect the purists will still say forced mate lines because that is something that is directly in their control (resignation is your opponent's choice), but I may be a low level dude because of my more relaxed position on the matter.
Oh dear! I'm sorry I crashed this party!
Chess players are an eccentric lot. Not unlike people who take their pets to compete in Cat Shows.
Thanks for "the final solution," @Bicarb.
Great Avatar, as well.
So do I, Apple-Headed Blue Point Siamese Cats, make wonderful companions.
The OP apparently hunts mice, as well. Small world.
Another case of the moronic quest for cheap mating thrills causing you to pass over MANY winning lines.
Great thinking Brainiac. One and half pawns is a Winning Advantage. All you need is to convert it. Instead, you pass up multiple chances for a 5 or 10 point advantage, because you wanted a flashy mate?
And you brag about it in the forums? That's another reason why your rating in the cellar. What a numb-nuts you are.
Sorry but, was this directed at me?
Do not worry about that at all.
Amusing Cheating Accusation
by XDave121X a few minutes ago
Can intelligent person suck at chess, forever?
by adweithisdeadly 3 minutes ago
9/5/2015 - Ragozin - Bronstein, USSR Championship 1945, Modif
by Nanacc 10 minutes ago
*NEW* Report Spam here!
by ChessPatzer987 11 minutes ago
Quite a sort loser
by Rosheen-Dove 13 minutes ago
Magnus Carlsen: 2900
by XDave121X 14 minutes ago
Predictions for the 2015 Chess World Cup
by Synaphai 17 minutes ago
The Perfect Game...?
by Lady-Knight 23 minutes ago
Another Chess Poem!
by Lady-Knight 44 minutes ago
Intentionally Aborted or Disconnected
by Slobbe 57 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!