11747 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Another case of the moronic...
I think Eats_Mice just focused to much on the mate, causing him to overlook the obvious.
Agree completely. @TheMiceEater was focused on "the hole in the doughnut," instead of just winning the game, safely. His loss.
As per Anatoly Karpov, in his new book, Find the Right Plan, (2010) -- the Fundamental Law of Chess is -- "to restrict the mobility of your opponents pieces" (direct quote).
And don't lose, too.
Looks like this party will not end till the mate is found.
I like it.
@Bicarb has already provided "the solution."
Are you too lazy to actually read this thread, @YourRoyalAssBishop?
No surprises there.
If you have to choose between maybe mate in x and an easy major advantage, it's often best to keep it simple. Mate (or resignation) will follow anyway.
Always play with (at least) a 5 second bonus.
You will rarely run out of time, unless the Queen's are still on the board, or you haven't gotten out of the middlegame.
Endgame knowledge can be implemented rather quickly, in most cases. That's all @MiceyMan needed to do.
though the mate is always handy when your flag is ready to drop
Of course, although a major material and positional advantage usually makes it possible to move almost instantly. And in this case they had 7 days per move...
Geez, you some of you guys are getting really upset about this... -OP
Nah, some of us simply won't suffer fools gladly.
It's just a character flaw, that we need to work on.
It's ok. I don't need to prove myself to anyone. I just wanted to find that mate.
5/18/2015 - Winning Simplification
by chessfriend007 a few minutes ago
5/19/2015 - Mate in 5
Should I play 1.d4?
by pfren 2 minutes ago
5/22/2015 - Surya Ganguly - Emanuel Berg , Gibraltar, 2009
by rowlem 3 minutes ago
5/20/2015 - Mate in 4
by chessfriend007 7 minutes ago
Who is the best? Fischer,Karpov,Kasparov,Tal,Aronian,Anand,Caruana or Carlsen?
by GreedyPawnEater 7 minutes ago
Wrecking dat kingside
by Migilla 9 minutes ago
The game should let you swear
by Bechamel 10 minutes ago
by VyboR 13 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by AnishBhargava 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!