14820 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have got my tactics to 1690 but I find a position like this so difficult, there seems to be so many possibilities and threats all over the place that had I not known how Kasparov played this, I would be totally lost yet I still find what he did as hard to comprehend.
Pls could an experienced player explain how they would approach this game as white and give some reasoning??
It doesn't have to be the same as Kasparov but any good approach would help.
I keep practising tactics but am finding it hard to get over the 1700 mark.
I would really appreciate for a stronger player than me to explain the dynamics of this position.
The answer to how this game went can be found by following this referance 'Kasparov-Short London PCA Wch (9) 1993' . White ended up with a virtually decisive advantange.
Thankyou very much
Just a quick glance at the position and white looks busted.
0-0-0 Nxg3 and white must surely be lost
Qb3 Nxc5 cant be much better.
Qc1 and white is undeveloping, not doing anything against the threats.
Im guessing the right move is Be5, if Nxc3 Qxf5 and the discovery is not leading to anything I hope, if f6 Bxf6 Nxf6 Qxf5. If Ng3 something like hxg3 Bxc2 Bxh8. Finally if 0-0 we castle long, and Ng3 can be answered with hxg3 with a mate threat on h8.
Such a position certainly requires much calculating powers and is not as much about evaluation of the position.
Thanks very much for the reply. You are also right that Be5 is the right move that Kasparov played
I reviewed the game, I was way off on my variations, but GM's and certainly Kasparov live in a different world than me.
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by RonaldJosephCote a few minutes ago
Nimzowitsch's Defense answer to d4 d5 Nc3
by pfren a few minutes ago
e3, K2, a3 - What is this crazy opening called?
by notmtwain 5 minutes ago
Is the "attack" enough??
by socialista 7 minutes ago
The King's Gambit
by batgirl 9 minutes ago
by Melanie-420 9 minutes ago
3/7/2014 - Mate in 4
by wyattthorson 9 minutes ago
Rate the username above
by SebLeb0210 9 minutes ago
If We Renamed the King to Queen, and...
by beerpatzer 10 minutes ago
Stiffness and Flexibility
by Monster-Bullet 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!