I agree, simply 4....d5 and you are ok
thank you so much. very clear to see now. hehe. i find myself going on cruise control at the beginning of games and it causes me alot of trouble. Live and learn!
Thanks again!
4...Nxe4 - "I ignored his knight for some reason"
Ignoring your opponent is usually a bad idea. Here he's attacking f7 with two pieces and only your king defends it. If Nxf7 he forks your rook and queen. Let's look at some ideas I've seen people play here:
If 4...h6?? you threaten his knight, but that only forces him to play a good move. 5.Nxf7 Qe7 6.Nxh8 and White has won a rook and a pawn (even if you manage to trap his knight, White comes out way ahead).
If 4...Qe7? now f7 is attacked twice and defended twice, but Black can still play 5.Bxf7+!. Notice 5...Qxf7 6.Nxf7 Kxf7 leaves you "up a piece" but trading a queen (+9) for a knight and bishop (+6) is a terrible plan! So after 5...Kd8 6.Bb3 White is simply up a pawn and you've lost the right to castle.
So 4...d5! 5.exd5 Nxd5 and you've stopped White's immediate attack dead in its tracks. Although the pawn sacrifice 6.d4!? is interesting. How would you reply?
While 4. ...d5 is Black's best move here, you're not quite "ok" yet. This opening is known as the Fried Liver Attack and is used mainly to attempt an early attack which is unsound if the Black player is prepared for it. There are a few acceptable variations, a couple of which I'll evaluate below (be sure to click on the "move list" button to see the different variations).
what about, in this position (after move 5) 5...Qf6?
if whites castle than Ne4 only gets a cramped position (or trades a bishop and a knight for a rook.)
why diddent
a. the bishop attack the pawn
b. the pawn attack the knight
hmmmm?
Move 5, after he took the pawn
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ