11659 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
After chess club ended at my school, I didn't play for about a month. When I finally did play my first game, I sucked. Badly. In fact, I dropped over 200 points in blitz in two days. While my rating isn't where it was, it's now back on the way up and I think I've recovered at least some of what I've lost. However, I'm still plauged by blunders, hanging pieces, and whatnot. I think that that stuff will self correct over time.
So, here's my most recent game that includes many blunders and inaccuracies on both sides, but the endgame was pretty fun. What I want from those who read this post is advice on what aspect of chess should I work on first. (tactics, endgame, opening, development, etc.)
R+P ending should have been drawn.
Try to use tactics trainer-It is the best way to improve your rating
47... Rxc2 should win. Q+P v R is easy
47...Rb1+ seems to draw, philidor position.
In general, I'm not sure if your question can be reasonably answered based on just one game but this game in particular can hardly be representative.
How are we supposed to judge your play in the opening/early middlegame if your opponent blunders a piece at move 6? Also, the game would be better example if you had used long enought time control to avoid the time induced mistakes towards the end.
u could have easily won on move 47 if u took the knight instead of checking him
Tactics and in my opinion, it's not even close.
Not practice more in tactics. Buy books or watch online that discussed about positional chess.
Tactics that does not have strtegy and plan is nothing. It is better to know first how to assess the type of positions. :)
Bishop sacs!! Hahahah. I see you like to do it a lot now. :D Anways good job on promoting.
i think 26...g6? is a typical mistake because you was too affraid of the mating threat. However, you can simply retreat your rook : 26...Rf8, 26...Re8, 26...Ra8 or maybe 26...Rc8 and white remains a piece up. Afterthat go for 27...g6 or others to avoid all back rank mate. So, secure your win.
10/13/2015 - Removing The Defense
by sureskumar a few minutes ago
Why are women not as successful as men in chess?
by cheeky_chicky 3 minutes ago
At what tactical level should i start studying complex positional ideas?
by vinz88 7 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by dragonair234 9 minutes ago
Good luck in chess?
by Squishey 14 minutes ago
10/12/2015 - No Escape
by beauti_kanta 19 minutes ago
Tactics Championships!!!!!! (YOU WILL FAIL!) :) *not*
by dipas 26 minutes ago
SCID vs PC
by HGMuller 29 minutes ago
by dipas 34 minutes ago
8/7/15 Mate in 3
by mopmopmopmop 39 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!