^ Click here to remove ads! ^

when a blitz game offers sufficient insight into the budapest..

« Forums home
Forums > Game Analysis
Post New Topic
Jump to forum:
 
6th December 2008, 05:56am
#1
by kaos2008
leicester United Kingdom
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 184

i  played this game against a superior player ( by ratings) and thus was pleasantly surprised when he obliged and played the budapest...

please feel free to correct and comment.

7th December 2008, 12:35am
#2
by mnag
San Diego United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 133

I think White should have played 25. Rd1 and be more active on the d file instead of the unnecessary and bad plan of doubling rooks on the e file. In this position it makes little sense to push the e pawn since it can easily be stopped.

7th December 2008, 12:45am
#3
by kaos2008
leicester United Kingdom
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 184

i absolutely agree..

7th December 2008, 01:07am
#4
by Sawin
Páty Hungary
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 111

I think 13-,b6 was the first inaccurate move in the game. It weakens the diagonal, and White could have taken the initative with 14.Be4. You must withdraw the B to d7, because if Qd7, than Bxf6 and your kingside is weak.

13th February 2009, 12:57pm
#5
by kaos2008
leicester United Kingdom
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 184
Sawin wrote:

I think 13-,b6 was the first inaccurate move in the game. It weakens the diagonal, and White could have taken the initative with 14.Be4. You must withdraw the B to d7, because if Qd7, than Bxf6 and your kingside is weak.

 true..

but the essense of speculative gambits is to throw the opponent off their stride..

that seems to have worked cos I got the feeling my opponent hated the resulting imbalance.

 
^ Back to top

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.