13291 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
But what about 2 rooks vs. 1 Queen + a whole lot of pawns on both sides? Surely the queen is in advantage?
Looking from a purely theoretical perspective, two rooks are better because of their material value.Rook + Rook = 5 + 5 = 10Queen = 9Of course, it does depend on the position as well. Whether there are pawn chains, open files. Also how much each king is exposed and whether the rooks (or the queen) are active, purposeful or connected.
There is 1 more factor that was overlooked. Whose move?
The side who got the 1st move is the stronger side.
Not necessarily. Tactical-time advantage is temporary. If the position is better for the other side, the side with the first move will slowly lose its initiative.
One factor not discussed is the human factor. Some people are like the queen better and are better with it. Also when some people play against the queen with the two rooks they blunder and leave one of the rooks loose and so forth.
@all those posting 2R vs Q on an empty board and declaring it a draw : by this logic, a bishop is worth as much as two knights. All that proves is that 2R are not worth much more or much less than the queen.
Putting apart the "human" / "psychology" / "he doesn't know how to play" factor :
Though, on the average, they are of roughly equal value, in a typical position either the rook or the queen are much better than the other.
It depends on the position, not as usual, but more than as usual. The crucial factor is king safety - unsafe kings push towards a draw.
i'm in a game where can make an exchange leaving two rooks against a queen. we have 5 pawns each. should i do it? both about 1400 evenly matched. should i even b asking for advice here? thnx
Asking for advice on a game is pretty strictly prohibited. Play out the game on your own skill and ask if you made the right choice once the game is over.
I didn't see it mentioned in the posts, but I think if there is another minor piece involved (even on both sides) it changes the equation. Of course position is paramount. With just a queen vs. R+R, I'm thinking the two rooks can be more nasty. Through in a minor on each side, the Queen + the minor can cause a lot of damage quickly if they are positioned to coordinate.
thanks ivandh, will do that.
In the final of this year's world cup, Kramnik won with 2 rooks vs. a queen:
how to make plan
by thinkingdeep a few minutes ago
Chess rating system
by toupper a few minutes ago
Has anyone challenged CCA's "Mixed doubles" yet?
by bigpoison 6 minutes ago
Is there a link between performance in chess and general intelligence?
by rdecredico 7 minutes ago
Standard ratings corrupted?
by Scottrf 7 minutes ago
10/21/2014 - Mate in 3
by Igor_Gagarin 8 minutes ago
Windows Phone 8 Beta Testers Needed
by vidarnordnes 10 minutes ago
Today is my birthday! Should I change my username?
by tonichaturanga 12 minutes ago
Opening book with good explenation
by Passero82 16 minutes ago
Can anyone identify the maker of my Vintage Club Staunton Chess Set?
by Gomer_Pyle 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!