Sred wrote:
imirak wrote:
Sred wrote:
The engine is of course much stronger, but surely it sometimes picks suboptimal moves deliberately. That's how they make it 1547.
No, that's clearly a bug in the programming. Once the king got to the back rank, it immediately promoted a pawn.
Anecdotic evidence doesn't prove much.
So your suggestion is that the computer intentionally made dozens of bad moves, consecutively?
If that is a legitimate game, then it's pretty convincing evidence of a programming bug.
The engine is of course much stronger, but surely it sometimes picks suboptimal moves deliberately. That's how they make it 1547.
No, that's clearly a bug in the programming. Once the king got to the back rank, it immediately promoted a pawn.
Anecdotic evidence doesn't prove much.