Why did I lose this?

Jump to forum:
 
17th April 2009, 07:48pm
#1
by greekgeek
Fairfield United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 74

We both made mistakes...but I was pretty excited when I took his rook and evened the game.  Then...I slipped.  What could I have done to save my endgame?

17th April 2009, 07:58pm
#2
by InoYamanaka
Hidden Leaf Village International
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 3019

that was too long but it might have helped to save the rook instead of going striaght for his knight

17th April 2009, 08:04pm
#3
by Omicron
Buenos Aires Argentina
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 203

I believe you should have tried to keep the bishop pair. 2 Bs vs B+N was a lot better for you than for him; so maybe you could have avoided the black bishop exchange.

Moreover.. after move 41.b4, you had a decent position but you screwed it up with kd7? (no offense). You had no real need to run for his passed pawns, since they can't get pass your bishop without some moves. You had a nice pawn wall in the kingside that you should have pushed.  40. ....; f4 was a good alternative. by your move 39...a5, it even looked like you were preparing that push but somehow forgot about it.

sorry for not adding specific lines, but I'm kinda sleepy and would probably post wrong ones.

cheers

17th April 2009, 08:11pm
#4
by InoYamanaka
Hidden Leaf Village International
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 3019
Omicron wrote:

I believe you should have tried to keep the bishop pair. 2 Bs vs B+N was a lot better for you than for him; so maybe you could have avoided the black bishop exchange.

Moreover.. after move 41.b4, you had a decent position but you screwed it up with kd7? (no offense). You had no real need to run for his passed pawns, since they can't get pass your bishop without some moves. You had a nice pawn wall in the kingside that you should have pushed.  40. ....; f4 was a good alternative. by your move 39...a5, it even looked like you were preparing that push but somehow forgot about it.

sorry for not adding specific lines, but I'm kinda sleepy and would probably post wrong ones.

cheers


 true that would be a good thing. he couldve won bishop pair against bishop and knight

17th April 2009, 08:19pm
#5
by idosheepallnight
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 1726

33 .....Be8 seems like the beginning of the end. Why not 33. ....a4 ?

 

At least put a fight up for your rook pawn. Obviously when you gave up that pawn its a white pawn storm on the queen side, creating threats you can not handle.

If you had of protected it with your bishop you could have attacked the white Knight with your king.

17th April 2009, 08:23pm
#6
by idosheepallnight
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 1726

Also your moves from 38 onward were terrible. You have no plan and you dont seem to care for you pawns. You needed to try to force a passer on the king side.

 

At least something like 39 ...h4 would have at least put up a fight. But the game actually ended at 33 when you gave up your ciritcal a pawn.

17th April 2009, 08:29pm
#7
by Eli
United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 208

You didn't protect your pawns at all!

17th April 2009, 11:50pm
#8
by NM tonydal
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 4783

Actually, you were set up for two forks on move 22, and you should've gone for the other one (22... Nf3+ followed by taking the bishop, and your knight is able to hop back out).  Then you have a bit of a material advantage.  By taking the exchange, you remain a pawn down.  The bishops offer a bit of compensation there, but not really too much.

18th April 2009, 12:26am
#9
by Politicalmusic
Alabama United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 2450

Opening mistakes.  Move 9 and 15 missing a piece and giving away a piece.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.