12548 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Okay, so here's the game we played up until my opponent's resignation.
Please help me figure out the reason for my opponent's resignation.
Hmm, that's strange...
I'm not sure why...
I don't get why you moved your knight to g4 on 12 or thought you're knight couldn't avoid capture. It was safe on f6.
White must have had something else to do.
It definitely wasn't chess reasons, you threw away a piece for nothing and traded down to make his job easier.
As for your questioning near the start, it's a very common opening, the Scotch. Nobody is forced to play the Ruy Lopez.
As for the 'why my opponent did this, I'll never know'. He didn't want to leave his bishop hanging, and taking yours gave him a tempo to take the free pawn you gave him.
He probably had to go.
cause my wife came home from the grocery store sooner then I thought she would.. Normally she's she spends more time and money there then she did today. So I lost a chess game but saved money.
I know a few people would prefer to rename the thread "Why didn't I resign?"
people resign because they're bored or have things to do as often as they've played badly. you should have resigned earlier in this game
When you have to go...well....you have to go!! lol
I have a policy: Never resign if you have even a percent chance of winning.
(Of course, this policy is null and void if you have to do something in RL)
Your 17... Rxe1+ move aquires nothing other than a simple exchange of rooks, which is to his advantage as he is already winning. Moving a piece to give check is a bad move unless you have something backed up after it. A better attempt to get control of the open file may have been to douple up your rooks.
Ok I fess up.The lady's husband was coming in the front door as I was going out the back door!
Which is better, Bishop or Knight?
by jonnin a few minutes ago
How could've White avoid this loss? How could've Black done better?
by yeres30 4 minutes ago
Scorpion Pawn structure?
by aussiedj 4 minutes ago
Kasparov says there IS ratings inflation...
by The_Ghostess_Lola 10 minutes ago
8/31/2015 - The Hunt
by Awesomeperson464 11 minutes ago
by RonaldJosephCote 12 minutes ago
Do you mention chess on dates?
by PHudson 14 minutes ago
Chess Lessons for Life
by EliTeDavee 15 minutes ago
by EliTeDavee 21 minutes ago
Studying openings is highly UNDERrated!
by X_PLAYER_J_X 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!