14390 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't put much trust in the percentage results of databases that include games from all rating levels.
One problem is that your choice of move can often be affected by your opponent's rating... if you were an IM, would you play in the same style against a GM as against a 1600 player? So the strength of the opponent affects both your choice of lines and ALSO the result of the game (you are more likely to win against a 1600 than against a GM). This artificially inflates the percentages for certain lines.
Another problem is best illustrated by a diagram:
The 365chess database gives this move by Black a 42.9% winning percentage, compared to 35.7% for White. A good move, yes?
No. It loses by force (!) to 14. Bh6!!
Why are the winning percentages so far out of whack? Because once the refutation was discovered, nobody played that line anymore, so the percentages were "frozen" in place at the point just before the refutation was found.
This is wxactly the reason why Chess Opening Wizard is so good. It backsolves lines that were "percentage wise" good moves, and lets you know what is played now.
you do know who learned me the french defence in the first place, right second :) After one and a half match with you and my rating is already skyrocketing.
I will check out chess opening wizard and see what it is...
Thank You Sir,
But please keep in mind, that all i did was give you the tools to improve. It was up to you to use them. Your improvement is because of you!
um. yeah, looks like you've done far more research than i'm able/willing to do so, yeah, good enough.
Actually, internet research is one of the things I'm GOOD at. It's a matter of selecting exactly the right combination of search key-words... not so much to find the information you want, as to EXCLUDE the millions of pieces of irrelevent information that you DON'T want.
5.Qa4 against Grunfeld and Queen's Indian defence.
by TwoMove 6 minutes ago
who is the best chess player of all time?
by SmyslovFan 7 minutes ago
To play online or not to play online..
by DjonniDerevnja 7 minutes ago
Should chess be considered a sport?
by marcomarco13 10 minutes ago
Any way to get around this repotire
by TwoMove 14 minutes ago
Common EndGame Mistakes
by Murgen 17 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer: Partial solutions skew rating
by DaveKovacsPhil 19 minutes ago
Do you know rules of castling:Tim krabbe
by MrUlekleiv 22 minutes ago
Reliable open? - 1000 rating not stupid questions
by iBotelho 24 minutes ago
7/1/2015 - Mate in 3
by AleksaS96 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!