7956 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I thought when I'd finished this one that I'd played particularly well. I won a pawn in the opening, simplified to a double Rook and opposite coloured Bishop ending and then attacked with the "extra piece" theme, that such endings allow.
Simple play in action:
Feel free to comment.
11.Kb1 "Kills a few bird with one stone: defends the a-pawn. gets the King off the c1-h6 diagonal and off the c-file."And prevents: 11...Qa5? (I remember I played it once too...)
Yeah, when I played Kb1, I wasn't expecting Qa5.
That lost pawn is absolutely critical by the looks of it. It's not just the pawn, it's the passive position that Black gets.
I managed to win an ending, in a game that only lasted 27 moves.
I love having my knights on c3 and d4. This is one of my favorite openings. Well played but why did you go long castle instead of developing the knight and castling kingside?
Going Kb1 after castling queenside is one of the most basic chess ideas, so lower rated players learn from that game!
Castling long is the simple main line against the Dragon, this way white can launch a kingside attack without endangering his own.
I was intending to conduct the Yugoslav Attack.... i.e. throw my King-side pawns against his fianchettoed King. The f3 pawn supports g4, h4, h5, Bh6 etc.
Here's a classic example of the Yugoslav Attack in action:
And here's an example of the Yugoslav Attack, in my hands:
Oh, interesting. I'm still a beginner with openings, since I started learning about them no more than 4 months ago. It's indeed a fair point probably proven by years of theory, although I would go O-O because I have fear of bishops on long diagonals. :)
Guess I need to learn more since my chesssense can be beaten if the enemy has it as well, while also having a lot of theory knowledge.
@Doggy: your last game's 11th move, my game http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=63326552 9th move.
GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE! ^^
Yeah, it's good to hang on to that Bishop, if possible. Fischer played it on move 11 in his game too. We all stand on the shoulders of giants.
lol. It's kind of whoever seizes the initiative first when you castle on opposite sides.
Haha, yeah. Although our cases are kind of similar, they are totally different.
Btw, you should see it very fast looking at your tactics trainer. There is a very nice tactics for black if I hadn't backed my bishop there. Why didn't I go Be3 in 9th move?
I think it would be about 1800 puzzle on TT. (although I had waaay more time than that for it xD)
6/18/2013 - Tal-Starodub, Petrozavodsk 1984
by Kopsir a few minutes ago
How is this even possible?!?!?! Please, can someone explain this?!
by waffllemaster a few minutes ago
Would a 2000 ELO player beat Kasparov if he had a piece advantage?
by Arral 3 minutes ago
can we say naka is as good as magnus
by fabelhaft 4 minutes ago
Really Bad Sportsmanship in Real Tournaments
by PhoenixTTD 5 minutes ago
I feel that I deserve a higher rating
by LongIslandMark 7 minutes ago
6/17/2013 - Mate in 3
by abhishek1210 8 minutes ago
by unbtble 9 minutes ago
Will Chess.com ever introduce a cubit system?
by LongIslandMark 14 minutes ago
My debut game
by Immortal-Gladiator 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com