Your online rating is about 200 points higher than your live rating. I suggested it would tend to be about 100 points higher. I wasn't far off.

I was judging by standard games, and looking back, your standard live rating is 119 points lower than your turn-based rating, so i was on the money. Obviously you are not a blitz player, but I don't see how that is relevant.

I really don't understand what you mean by "on the other side." Your online ratings are higher than your live ratings in all categories, as I expected.

You're saying he's "obviously not a blitz player" because his standard live rating is somewhat lower than his turn-based rating? That's absurd and condescending as well. Do you realize that online chess ratings are inflated in general and usually the difference is several hundred?

I would love to hear what kind of rating someone should have to qualify as a "blitz player".

I would expect a blitz player to have a good blitz rating.

/argument

the idiot of bojan_kdrfbeur or whoever he was, has been banned from chess.com.. what a rat..

nice !!