A win and a loss in just 23 moves

Jump to forum:
 
25th December 2007, 02:16am
#1
by western_burn
Brampton, Ontario Canada
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 185

The first game was played against a weaker opponent. The second was played against a much stronger opponent.

26th December 2007, 05:15am
#2
by bobmutch
Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 19

2 very terrible games : )

So where do they play chess in Brampton.  Is there a chess cafe there? 


26th December 2007, 05:56am
#3
by Skillz88
Behind you!! jokin, I'm on your left. United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 183
thats a bit harsh! Aris played really well
26th December 2007, 06:18am
#4
by gateman234
Australia
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 42

pretty sweet setup buy aris.

you should have played on you could have gone for stale mate or your opponent could run out off time, and you could have won, you shouldnt have just resigned like that

26th December 2007, 04:51pm
#5
by western_burn
Brampton, Ontario Canada
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 185

Bobmutch, I do enjoy otb play and have a few friends who I do play with, but I have yet to find a club or tournament to enroll in. Let me know if you're ever in the area and we could meet at a coffee shop.

I do feel that my position was lost in the 2nd game. I played my queenside knight when I ment to move out my kingside... no real explaination as to how that happened. I had faith in my opponent that he would not let me stalemate after setting up that trap. I also feel that resigning is proper in that to not resign such a postion would be an insult.

Thank you everyone for your comments. Feel free to post similar short games in here.

27th December 2007, 10:25pm
#6
by xevs
Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 101

I can't see why black would resign here. I guess I am missing something.

 

The black queen can move to safety and Nxf7 loses the bishop.

 

Enlighten me, please.

29th December 2007, 05:38pm
#7
by western_burn
Brampton, Ontario Canada
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 185
I think you just enlightened me. Perhaps a strong case of rating intimidation?
29th December 2007, 07:17pm
#8
by mxdplay4
mids UK England
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 707
western_burn wrote: I think you just enlightened me. Perhaps a strong case of rating intimidation?

White has the fairly strong Tongue out threat of Rc1 (-c8) which can be met, but I think e6 loses to Rc8+, Ke7 then white plays Bg5+! which forces black to play f6 or Nf6 blocking the king's escape route, then d6# is mate unless the black Q can take the pawn, when white gets the Q back. If you see what I mean.  Maybe not quite time to resign Smile

13th January 2008, 04:42pm
#9
by western_burn
Brampton, Ontario Canada
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 185

Here's an eight-mover that I recently played OTB. It was my opponents first time seeing the blackmar-deimer gambit, and it was a friendly but fast paced game.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Also, please feel free to post your short games in here, and comments and critisisms are welcome.

 

 

4th February 2008, 04:49am
#10
by dalmatinac
Croatia
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 3201
2nd game 9...Nd4!
4th February 2008, 05:32am
#11
by scandinaviandefense
Michigan United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 459

On your game against Munchkin:

The Opening was the Albin Countergambit. Blackmar Diemer is 2. e4.

 


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.