11618 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This was a game played between to members of my club who met in real rated tournament play for the first time. White was the top seed and playing black was a club memeber who was 100 or so lower rated than white. The ONLY reason this ended in a draw was because of time otherwise black would have won with ease.
wow which spectator were you chessmaster and did you play in the tournament cause the game your showing is the game I played I'm the white player and OMG that knight fork at the end would have destroyed me.
The game has all the factors a attacker would look for in a game.
I think both played atleast 2000 stregth.
Is this chess? After a move as simple as 9.0-0 Black can resign.
9...a6 is just ridiculous. White again has 10.0-0 and it's ciao bambino.
Is castling before move ten forbidden at your club?
lol no thanks for spotting that out I agree white would have been better.
But then this is no 2000+ strength but rather nine below zero.
was that statement really nesscarry or are you joking
No, I am not joking. What's a joke is this game: full of major blunders from both sides.If it is a bullet game, then it is OK (since bullet isn't chess). Under any other time limit, it is a joke.
If you care, I can mention two handfuls of them, but 'm afraid it won't help much since you have spotted just one mistake you've done, and not that virtually every second move you played overlooked something fat.
Well other than the last mistake what else did I miss.
title is misleading.
The game is not aggresive even though it arises from a gambit line. There is also not much of an attack.
whats considered a good attack to you then ?
The slow building of well-positioned pieces , and then the forced opening of lines. The use of tactical opportunities i.e. pins, skewer to add the the attack. Forced loss of material. Simplification and winning.
Predictions: How Long Will He be Champ?
by clms_chess a few minutes ago
What's the quickest way to get a title?
by FromMuToYou 2 minutes ago
How to 'decipher' Fritz comments
by Mersaphe 3 minutes ago
Official Chess Troll of the Year!
by 1RedKnight99 4 minutes ago
Crazy Move in Grunfeld! How to beat this annoying line?
by GeorgeBlackChess123 4 minutes ago
12/9/2013 - Mate in 3
by molskaya488 8 minutes ago
by Twinchicky 9 minutes ago
Cheap Wal-Mart Paperback Tactics
by HessianWarrior 14 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by aerodarts 16 minutes ago
Simple basic chessboard for following instruction.
by kleelof 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!