Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Aggressive sparked game #2


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1

    chessmaster102

    This was a game played between to members of my club who met in real rated tournament play for the first time. White was the top seed and playing black was a club memeber who was 100 or so lower rated than white. The ONLY reason this ended in a draw was because of time otherwise black would have won with ease.



  • 2 years ago · Quote · #2

    Davidjordan

    wow which spectator were you chessmaster and did you play in the tournament cause the game your showing is the game I played I'm the white player and OMG  that knight fork at the end would have destroyed me.Frown

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #3

    CassidyT

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 2 years ago · Quote · #4

    edrobin58

    The game  has all the factors a attacker would look for in a game.Smile

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #5

    chessmaster102

    I think both played atleast 2000 stregth.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #7

    chessmaster102

    pfren wrote:

    Is this chess? After a move as simple as 9.0-0 Black can resign.

    9...a6 is just ridiculous. White again has 10.0-0 and it's ciao bambino.

    Is castling before move ten forbidden at your club?

    lol no thanks for spotting that out I agree white would have been better.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #9

    Davidjordan

    pfren wrote:
    chessmaster102 wrote:

    lol no thanks for spotting that out I agree white would have been better.

    But then this is no 2000+ strength but rather nine below zero.


    was that statement really nesscarry or are you jokingUndecided

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #11

    Davidjordan

    Well other than the last mistake what else did I miss.Undecided

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #12

    finalunpurez

    title is misleading.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #13

    chessmaster102

    finalunpurez wrote:

    title is misleading.

    how ?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #14

    finalunpurez

    chessmaster102 wrote:
    finalunpurez wrote:

    title is misleading.

    how ?

    The game is not aggresive even though it arises from a gambit line. There is also not much of an attack.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #15

    chessmaster102

    whats considered a good attack to you then ?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #16

    jerry2468

    The slow building of well-positioned pieces , and then the forced opening of lines. The use of tactical opportunities i.e. pins, skewer to add the the attack. Forced loss of material. Simplification and winning. Cool


Back to Top

Post your reply: