Budapest Gambit

Jump to forum:
 
22nd April 2008, 10:38pm
#1
by matzleeach
Chicago IL United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 804

I would admitted I was caught a little off guard. I never seen or even heard of a Budapest Gambit. After the 3rd move, I was in unfamiliar waters. Now there are mistakes in this game and black pieces are more alive than mine, however I carefully was able to get my pieces into the game and fought my way into a winning endgame.

 

 


22nd April 2008, 11:19pm
#2
by NM tonydal
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 4393

37... b5 was an unfortunate choice.  It looks like he had 37... Qe5+ and if 38 g3 Qf5 getting some play.

 

Another possibility was 36... Bxh3. 


22nd April 2008, 11:33pm
#3
by matzleeach
Chicago IL United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 804
Oh...I made a mistake I was white in this game. I change the name around.
23rd April 2008, 12:06am
#4
by firerods
mumbai India
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 117

well played

 


23rd April 2008, 12:27pm
#5
by Loomis
Durham, NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 3059

Your opponent was not keeping a close eye! I think 4. Nf3 is a mistake because it allows 4. ... Bc5 attacking your f2 pawn. If you defend it with 5. e3 then you cut your bishop off from going to f4. So typically you would play Bf4 and then Nf3 instead of the order you did it in. Maybe it's not a big deal, but I have always though 4. Bf4 was correct.

 

I prefer 9. e3 to 9. Bxd5. I don't see any reason to give up this bishop pair at this point in the game. 

 

 


23rd April 2008, 12:39pm
#6
by jasnj30
willow springs, il. United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 26
from what i can tell both sides played accurately, black gambited a pawn to build up an attack and white defended through the storm. after the fireworks through move ten your queenside is a little weak with a backwards pawn on b2. blacks queen has a nice central post and will castle first but its hard to see any way to take advantage before white caught up in developement. move 15 did drop a pawn but i thought that really only gave white another file to gang up on into blacks position. its really nice how white took control of the center and pushed black to the edge. thats what decided the game before the endgame was reached. i have read, try to keep your pawns off the color of your opponents bishop when you arrive at a bishop vs. bishop (same color) endgame. in the game it did not effect the outcome due to blacks king being unable to enter the game. it is something to aviod though.
23rd April 2008, 12:57pm
#7
by matzleeach
Chicago IL United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 804
Loomis wrote:

Your opponent was not keeping a close eye! I think 4. Nf3 is a mistake because it allows 4. ... Bc5 attacking your f2 pawn. If you defend it with 5. e3 then you cut your bishop off from going to f4. So typically you would play Bf4 and then Nf3 instead of the order you did it in. Maybe it's not a big deal, but I have always though 4. Bf4 was correct.

 

I prefer 9. e3 to 9. Bxd5. I don't see any reason to give up this bishop pair at this point in the game. 

 

 


Very good points Loomis... I believe 4.Bf4 is the correct play.


7th June 2008, 01:20pm
#8
by pfattkatt
allentown, pa United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 35
i believe i benefitted greatly from replaying this game. am i missing something, or was move 29 not a blunder that your opponent missed? why didn't he simply capture the rook? i tried to challenge you, but your settings won't let me. i would appreciate a challenge from you, and any one else who would care to.
7th June 2008, 01:22pm
#9
by pfattkatt
allentown, pa United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 35
never mind on the move 29 thing. i went back and looked at it again. you could have captured his rook iin return, with mate
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.