16378 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Winning move for black was ... Qc1+, not the promotion.
This is way too god play for such rating level.
This move was not played in the game.
If you believe ...Qc1+ ? in the last position is the way to win, you might want to check your lines.
EDIT : completely wrong. See e4_guy's next post. After 38...Qd1+ Black indeed wins.
new engines running on multi-core processors handle this type of opening with aplomb ... there is no like or not like, there is only calculation
After a point, yes. But fire up your engine and play those moves as white against it. It probably won't respond this way, it will pick a pawn-trade opening with lots of open space to manuver. Mine altered black's opening by move 4, what does yours do?
i dont waste time checking games against the engine ... i could care less if people use an engine i am only pointing out that they do, and frequently, and that one game here is hardly enough to make any type of judgement at all, regardless of match rate
After last move (38. d7) black has mate in 8 moves, starting with 38. Qc1+, 39. Qd1 . . .
If 39. Kh2, then Qf4+ etc.
i just lost to a guy 877 (aparantly) playing:
There are TONS of cheaters on this website. But not only that. Just as bad as the cheaters, there are also 'cheater enablers' (such as "wafflemaster"...what a ridiculous screenname) who defend the cheaters and, instead of admitting the problem of cheaters on this site, they will basically accuse you of being a sore loser. When I play chess games, I don't care if I win or lose. Losing is not the issue; it's the rampant cheating (people using chess engines) that I can't stand. Earlier today I started a post about this topic, bringing attention to the problem of cheaters on chess.com and, big surprise, chess.com deleted that post. Obviously they don't want any negative discussion about their site, even when that discussion is the truth.
Why would someone who is cheating have a low enough rating to play you?
Oh no sorry, I forgot, the whole world is plotting against you. Yeah, quit chess, there are too many cheaters there as soon as you go over 1000.
Jesus....you aren't a GM yourself. People win the lottery all the time.
Sometimes a bad player plays a few good moves.
@Scottrf: You do realize that anyone can play against any opponent, no matter what rating they have, right? So your question is totally irrelevant to what the original post was about (about cheaters and cheating). Was your question trying to change the subject, or ? I'll say it again below:
Not true, because most people limit their seeks.
But assuming it was, you haven't played any high rated players, so what explanation is there for these cheaters being rated in the 800s and 900s like you seem to play?
@Scottrf: You do realize that anyone can play against any opponent, no matter what rating they have, right?
You might want to check your facts first.
I think you missed the point.
The way I look at it, you cheat to beat players that you couldn't otherwise beat. Average on this site is a bit under 1300.
If you rate about 1100, 75% of players will usually beat you. Why would they feel the need to cheat?
@Chesslover1995 -I believe Scottrf's point is that at that level, unless the "cheater" can hardly play chess, cheating wouldn't be necessary.
Irontiger, you sound like the one who's paranoid, and delusional, because you refuse to accept the reality and to admit that there actually IS a problem of cheaters on this website. Perhaps you are one of the 'cheater enablers'? Maybe that would explain why you're so quick to defend cheaters?
I think there is a window of 150-200 rating points above and below you in which a player who is lower rated can beat you and you can beat a better rated player(not considering very obvious blunders). It mostly depends on opening in a fair game. If you have good position you have very good chances.
Most of the players in my rating range loose(including me) because they do not pause to think why the opponent played that move.
So, this is definitely an anomaly where a rating gap of around 600 was bridged. But its your mistake too. I only took one look and I think in the endgame when u played R*c2, u could have pushed the e-pawn. that problem probably would have been harder to solve for him.
On the matter of cheating, I have never played anyone who cheats in a live game. I have played computers and they kill you in tactical details, both when you are attacking or defending. Always, I see moves played based on intuition.
On the contrary, online games might be altogether different matter.
@Chesslover1995 -There is a problem of cheating everywhere. Many of us have been on this site long enough to know that there is a group for discussions of cheaters and cheating, and that's why it's removed from the open forums.
Edit: This isn't quite accurate. A group was allowed to be made for discussion of cheaters and cheating because it was not to be discussed in the open forums.
@Scottrf Your probably right just mad at myself for losing.
Not saying he didn't play well (and I only scanned over it, looks quite mistake free for a 900), but the moves look pretty natural and not too deep. I think he just had a good game (maybe a proper analysis reveals different).
totally agree with Scott, doesnt seem too special
No discussion of cheating in the public forums please.
If you'd like to report someone:
Carlsen (White) wins
by caveatcanis a few minutes ago
I've made a move in a 960 tournament game & it still shows I haven't moved.
by MrDamonSmith a few minutes ago
500 Movies with chess
by Crazychessplaya a few minutes ago
What is the lamest game or setup position you can think of.
by Glorfindel_1 2 minutes ago
Daily Puzzle 12/4/13-Mate in 3
by knightofcrashtest 3 minutes ago
Carlsen is mediocre - my analyses
by pfren 8 minutes ago
Question about Indian defences
by acejackneo 9 minutes ago
by Klutt_McNutt 9 minutes ago
by ViktorHNielsen 10 minutes ago
I do not have a connection
by ilgambittoo 11 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!