12109 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
yesterday I played the first round of the tournament in my city I won the first match by checkmate but I was confused I don't know what happened I was feeling like it was the first game of chess in my life I didn't know what am doing ( just moving the pieces without thinking ) at the end of the game I sacrificed my light square bishop I thought it's gonna lead for checkmate & there's noway for his king to survive after the game I looked to my moves and I saw he could run away with his king by Re8 Re6 follow up with Qf8.. anyway I won the first game and I was very lucky can anyone help me and analysis it so I can learn where my mistakes lies ?
here's the game :
1.Maybe it is better to play 5.Bf4 to develope the bishop first and then e3.
2.At move 7, you can play 7.cxd5 cxd5(7...Nxd5 8.Nxd5 9.Bc4 and then 10.Bxf7+) 8.Bb5 ... 9.Nxd5, wins a pawn.
3.Maybe you can simply won a pawn after 8.cxd5.
4.At move 24, I am sure that your opponent got dizzy after you brave f6 although this move is not accurate as indicated by you in the game analysis. In my opinion, you can play 24.Bxh5 gxh5 25.Qxh5 followed by 26.Rf4 27.Rg4+ or some threat like f6.
5.Anyway, congratulation to your winning, and good luck to you in the following games!
thanks for feedback..I really like you comments, stay with me at the upcoming rounds..
I will do my best next time..
As Gelfand showed, e3 is perfectly acceptable. It's just personal taste. Although, I think it was better to play 6. cxd5 cxd5 7. Qb3
Then the weakness of Black's a3-e8 diagonal is apparent, since black played the h6 time killer.
Anytime your opponent plays non-mainline there are likely drawbacks. It is an opportunity to jump on those drawbacks.
8. 0-0? Better was 8. cxd5 and winning the pawn.
Black missed 17... d5! with d-file domination to follow.
Black could have played. 22...f5 to prevent that f pawn into turning into a nail in the coffin.
yea I was really afraid from 17.....d5 I was hoping that's he will not see it I was saying : oh god please no!! =DD
thanks techron :)
"Reykjavik Open, Final Round | Commentary by FM Ingvar Johannesson & Fiona Steil-Antoni"
3/12/2014 - Forcing The Way Through
by ninetails06 2 minutes ago
Small trick , great win
by zabratian 6 minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by Itude 6 minutes ago
Looking to Join a Group
by Michahellis 6 minutes ago
by notmtwain 7 minutes ago
Awesome Mates: The Perfect Overthrow!!!!!!!!!
by salatoy 9 minutes ago
Why no more 3|0 tournaments?
by ZatamuS 13 minutes ago
♥ RARE ~ Fischer story ♥
by notmtwain 14 minutes ago
by wishiwonthatone 27 minutes ago
by notmtwain 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!