Greatest Chessgame?

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post
30th June 2009, 02:38pm
#41
by rob9258
Oak Park United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 152
atomichicken wrote:
rob9258 wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
rob9258 wrote:

The "Peruvian Immortal" is bogus -- the guy playing Black couldn't see a textbook tactic staring him in the face. This game does not even deserve to be called "good", since the opposition was substandard.

Sorry to rain on your parade, but I can't support that game.


I don't think the game deserves to be anywhere near top either, but to say that a guy isn't a good player for missing a double Rook sac followed by a Queen sac is pretty ludicrus! lol


 The double rook sac is merely a setup to the mating combination by deflecting the queen -- it is not very deep or difficult to see. The game is amateurish, and nothing to be particularly proud of.


Actually looking at it again I think you're probably right, even I would have probably spotted that..


I have no doubt.  Cool

1st July 2009, 02:54am
#42
by Jinshen
Barcelona Spain
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 4

The best post that I remember in all times!

1st July 2009, 07:14am
#43
by erikido23
United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 981

I don't remember the players or where it was played or what year.  But, I vaguely remember seeing a game where at least both queens were hanging and I think a rook for each side as well and none of them could be taken and then (if I remember correctly) white sacs a knight on the kingside. 

 

Isn't my vagueness compelling.

 

Anyone want to venture a guess what game this was?

1st July 2009, 07:35am
#44
by robmarsh
Oklahoma United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 84

Very long game...says a lot for there stamina

1st July 2009, 07:39am
#45
by robmarsh
Oklahoma United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 84
1st July 2009, 07:45am
#46
by erikido23
United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 981
2nd July 2009, 05:37am
#47
by mf92
Vojvodina Serbia
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 364
WanderingWinder wrote:

What's so great about that game (Tal-Keres)? I mean, it isn't bad, but I wouldn't put it even neear the top 50 I've seen.


Well there was no brilliant moves but the game was brilliant, and your right, but they almost made the whole list of best games only this one was left ;-)

2nd July 2009, 05:45am
#48
by RetGuvvie98
Manassas, VA United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 3926
erikido23 wrote:

excellent game, erikido23, thanks for posting it.  pandolfini used it in one of his video presentations some years back.   it is still a great game, with queens hanging for many moves, and all the rich tactics for the viewer to digest.

2nd July 2009, 06:04am
#49
by kid_of_chess
Ottawa,Ontario Canada
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5803

Steinitz vs Von Bardeleben, 1895

for the inedible breakfast on the 7th

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.