11811 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In this game my opponent was extremely difficult to beat despite being ranked a lot lower than me. He created many threats and slowly started clawing back the material he'd sacrifced to get an initiative. Luckily, I was finally able to find a pretty mating pattern and pull through.
28. ... Ne4 ?
Better: 28. ... Nh5 ! (a knight on the rim is not always grim) threatening both 29. ... Nxg3 and 29. ... Nxf4 followed by 30. .... Bxe5 winning material. After that white can resign.
If you miss such basic tactics then you don't need to wonder about opponents which are "extremely difficult to beat".
As well as threatening the queen, Ne4 cuts the rook on e1 off from defending the e5 knight (which is attacked by three pieces and defended by just two once the rook is cut off). So that is guaranteed to win material just as much as Nh5.In the end I got a whole rook out of it, but would always have at least got the knight.
I do however concede that Nh5 might be better due to the fact that white ends up with less of a threat.
I see Nh5 as better in that position too. It accomplishes the same initial task at hand (winning the piece), attacks the queen at the end of it all (giving black a tempo), keeps the c and d pawns happy cause they have a buddy, and eliminates whites mating chances then and there.
However, a win is a win no matter how its done, so kudos to you!
You're both right and I happily acknowledge that Nh5 was the better move. However, it so happened that at the time it was Ne4 that caught my eye. As ever, the main lesson for me is to take more time over my moves.
Good constructive criticism; thanks.
What do you think of players who attack before developing their pieces?
by Panzerkampfwagen_V a few minutes ago
Free Chess Sets From Manufacturers - a reply
by I_been_thinkin 3 minutes ago
My current playing set-up. Whats yours?
by informaticacobach29 3 minutes ago
Unknown Chess Pieces
by informaticacobach29 4 minutes ago
5/5/2015 - Mate in 3
by yun1208 5 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by Dio 6 minutes ago
How to punish your student?
by tkbunny 27 minutes ago
ask a professional chess player anything
by Reb 33 minutes ago
Blitz - A mistake to play classical openings?
by OhLand 36 minutes ago
running chess apps on linus
by SocialPanda 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!