11139 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is the recent game that I played with someone from brazil. I was white and he was black. The last move played by me was a checkmate and it also did show up in the list i.e Rf7# but the popup said that I lost on time because I ran out of time just when I clicked on my last move :@ I just hate losing this way and I don't understand why don't people just give up when they know that they have lost. When they see their opponents running out of time, they start making pre-mature moves without any logic and try to make their opponents run out of time. I don't consider this game as a lose for white. Anyway, here is the game.
Don't you think something needs to be done with this ?? please comment...
If you don't like it, move faster. Or play at longer time controls.
yeah, that would be a great idea but it hurts like hell when you are this close lol..
sure...it's no fun at all
It sucks, but playing on in a lost position on the hope that your opponent will run out of time is part of the game for fast time controls. That is a legitimate win for your opponent. Sorry!
As much as I don't like the time factor sometimes the object of chess is to win. considering that at the highest level's correct play on both sides is likely to lead to a draw one must outwit his opponent in which ever way presents itself. If I open in a live game and gain a significant time advantage and find myself down material I most certianly make more complicated intermediary moves. If your opponent cannot mate you in the given time controls and he runs out of time, he loses. Like it or not, this is chess.
whereas other times you play to lose??
OK captian obvious. I have been know to play to learn, trying openings and unknown to me gambits with the idea to learn a nuance more then to win.. I never mind losing to much as long as I played well and made no clearly ridiculous moves.. I'm right now playing the Alekhine D against 1950+ which I haven't played in years,, you think I think I'm going to win? not likely, but I will brush up skills faster this way with this defense and have fun doing it.
Depth Length Setting for Analyzing Games
by jerryhemeke2076 a few minutes ago
My first win against a NM!
by ElvenPrinceLegolas 5 minutes ago
Why does nobody play 1. c3?
by thechessplaya5 6 minutes ago
Should chess players wear clothing with ads to get sponsorship & funding?
by thechessplaya5 9 minutes ago
Difference between a GM and a Pizza
by thechessplaya5 12 minutes ago
Are tactics really the way to go?
by ponz111 14 minutes ago
New Chess Hall Of Fame Opens
by cabadenwurt 24 minutes ago
How to stop lagging?????
by LiveLearnFight 31 minutes ago
my first troll game
by wolverine96 32 minutes ago
How would you save the game?
by BigDoggProblem 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!