7039 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
PrawnEatsPrawn
Last year, I played a match in the Kent League (average under 171 ECF/ approx 2015 FIDE), in which I felt I had a somewhat fortuitous result. Here's that game:
http://blog.chess.com/PrawnEatsPrawn/match-vs-rainham
Well, one year on and the same match, same board (4 out of 6) and the same opponent. In the intervening time, I'd dropped a few points and he'd put on a few points.
Venue: Hastings and St. Leonards Chess Club
Time control: 36 moves in 90 minutes, followed by a 15 minute quick-play finish. This gives a three and a half hour game.
Playing conditions: Excellent: wooden boards and sets, digital clocks, refreshments served by the housekeeper.
So, I beat the same guy, two in a row, entirely on his blunders.
Feel free to comment, improve my play or celebrate my good luck (again!).
bigpoison
chrisr2212
Love it.. the semi-open g-file gives you great chances even if he didn't do a "Chukky" on the cleric. (f3-f4-f5 etc if he would not find Bg6 and f6).
I would have preferred 16 Bd3 though.
Refreshments served!
How long did you think about move six? What other moves did you consider? Any?
In a tournament game, I probably would have played this: 6. Qe2 Nf2 7. Qe3 Nxg2+.
What is a double pawn break? A diagram would be awesome if you’ve the time.
11. 0-0 was aesthetically pleasing.
That ending is just brutal! He should have sat on his hands.
Thanks for the post, ‘Prawn. Your annotated games are a fun read. You’re an intelligent and engaging writer.
The Hastings club employs the services of a live-in housekeeper. Proper old school.
Just a couple of minutes thinking, Nf3 looked to be safe (playing a new opening on no knowledge and didn't want to make a chump of myself). e5 looked attacking but ultimately over-ambitious IMO. I didn't consider any other sixth moves.... have you seen something?
Rowley_Junction
I enjoy reading you game reviews as well, Mr. Prawn. They are both analytical and humorous.
I don't understand this, can you check your notation? Posting a diagram would be better.
What is a double pawn break?
What I mean by this is somewhat nebulous, just an idea, nothing concrete. What I'm saying is that, at some unspecified juncture, I might be able to play the c3 pawn to c4. Assuming my opponent plays c6, then cxd5 cxd5 c4 (again).... this would leave me with a d-pawn that has potential to go to d5, really stirring up trouble.
Obviously there would be other pieces on the board, just for illustration of the idea.
I meant 8. Qe2. I'm not sure why it seems to screw up the numbering when you cut and paste from the analysis board.
Qe2 Nf4?? Bxf4
But maybe I should have looked at Qe2 more seriously, just seemed like something I didn't need to get involved with. You know, the old King and Queen on the same half-open file and Black able to castle immediately.
p.s. Oh! you mean *YOU* in a tournament... damn! I'm slow sometimes!
I've had a look at a few databases and let Houdini take a look. The upshot is that my opening play wasn't too bad, given that I was on new ground and had to "discover" the moves for myself.
However, I missed a trick when I played 6. Nf3 and not 6. e5:
I wouldn't mind playing white or black here, looks pretty doubled-edged, which is chesstalk for "advantage to the tactician". Although 12 h4 is a bit of a roller, and black may need a swindle.
waffllemaster
In your variation with 13.Bxf3 I think it gives an interesting position after 14.gxf4 (but not rook takes as you said).
By interesting I mean white has some pretty clear ideas (attack or c4 break) while black seems passive to me... well I guess he'd just take the bishop and then it's white who's a little worse so nevermind :p
Same set up as last year huh? It's almost too bad it ended so abruptly... good thing you didn't offer a draw :)
I think, as Chris said in post #3, after 17. Qf4 it's all White. The Queen-side is meaningless, White has the Centre wrapped up, just leaving the King-side.... White having the half-open file and an f-pawn that seems destined to run. The more I look at it, the more I like White.
Oh definitely, I'd much rather have white, black is just stuck defending there.
Players not acting like their rating?
by Anonymous_U 4 minutes ago
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by trysts 6 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by mohandisusa 8 minutes ago
''Gift from Viswanathan Anand''
by AnnaZC 15 minutes ago
Best computer for chess analysis?
by TheHandOfGod 17 minutes ago
Mate With 4 Knights!!
by AnkitSarkar 23 minutes ago
Interesting game. Please help.
by stephen_33 25 minutes ago
Colle System
by DomcaxD 31 minutes ago
which opening is better? Traxler or Double Muzio gambit?
by alexlaw 43 minutes ago
Sharing your repertoire, good or bad?
by TwoMove 62 minutes ago