7039 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
DragonJoey3
cruzfranzenrico
great game!!
laconian
wow! don't think I've ever seen a pawn mate before. ('course, it's not like I'm extensively experienced, but still....good game!)
vsarun
nice
rubycon
good game
silentfilmstar13
His problem was not that he was playing on the queenside. His problem was that he was playing poorly on the queenside. It is typical to play on the side of the board where one can gain an advantage. You had space on the kingside, he gained space on the queenside. This is not the wrong way to play. He needed to develop his pieces. Also, your king was wide open, so he had options of where to play if he had just developed.
Eiwob
Wouldn't 26. g7 be mate?
AMcHarg
The same pawn move one move earlier was also mate.
fog
awsome game pawn mate
skwirlguts
opponent is clearly not equal to you. Go back and look at that assessment of a trade. You would have lost two for one.
Better than 19.c3 was 19.Nxf6, when Black's knight on c6 hangs after the recapture.
Sothilde
Your annotation is crap, playing on the queenside while the other player attacks the kingside is perfectly reasonable, but still a good game
sstteevveenn
If Rxe7 then the bishop mates.
mwaltenburg
great game. nice mate by the pawn.
Yea, I know that playing on the queenside wasn't his problem, but still he didn't seem to want to defend the kingside. There were several mistakes by me in the game, some of them fairly serious blunders, but I'm not used to playing whole game in under 5 mins. Usually I'm a 15 minute or 10 minute player. Also I saw the mate one move earlier, but like I said I wanted to end it with our queens side by side.
shuttlechess92
meanie. that end was unnecessary ;)
trentthechessnut
[EDIT: Just saw comments above - appologies! :) ]whites RxR was not necessary! :D
How else was he/she to end the game? IMHO If you can KO your opponent quickly then do it.
Ok a classic puzzle:
White to play and mate in 4
Thanatos19
I have to agree with the other comments. Playing on the opposite side of your opponent is not a problem, the problem was that he was playing poorly. Also, i wouldn't recommend that opening against anyone who knew what he was doing, as they can shatter it rather easily, it takes too many moves, and your king is very vulnerable. Still cool to mate with a pawn.
chesslife
[EDIT: Just saw comments above - appologies! :) ]whites RxR was not necessarw
Chess life you are correct!!!!!!!!
I made an error in placement.
Fixed!
Players not acting like their rating?
by Anonymous_U 6 minutes ago
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by trysts 7 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by mohandisusa 10 minutes ago
''Gift from Viswanathan Anand''
by AnnaZC 16 minutes ago
Best computer for chess analysis?
by TheHandOfGod 19 minutes ago
Mate With 4 Knights!!
by AnkitSarkar 25 minutes ago
Interesting game. Please help.
by stephen_33 27 minutes ago
Colle System
by DomcaxD 33 minutes ago
which opening is better? Traxler or Double Muzio gambit?
by alexlaw 45 minutes ago
Sharing your repertoire, good or bad?
by TwoMove 64 minutes ago