hey yall, this is a game I played yesterday. I've been learning from Henrik Danielsen and his "polar bear" system. thought id post it cause i was most impressed with myself - other than the fact I missed a forced mate and the game went on for another 25 moves. so this is the perfect version where i dont miss the mate - cause well, the rest wasn't as beautifully cinematic. i've run analysis (chess.com analysis) on this game and i made no mistakes up until missing the forced mate (i know - im sorry) only innacuracys. 

on another note, im trusting the chess.com analysis less and less. yes it can show mistakes - but when will i ever play like a 2500 chess engine. NEVER thats when! lol

Thanks Henrik.

yep, that's a good game and a nice finish

you altered your game to make it look better?

you didn't find the mate, so i dont see the point in showing off something you didnt even do ...

I agree with styxtwo - the game up until the rook sac forced mate was pretty good, but not amazing. What makes the game very good is the finish, which you didn't actually play, so it's a little strange to post it as your game. Still, that is a nice forced mate (that the computer found).

gee , im sorry guys, i was just trying to share a game i played. i explained why i added the forced mate, cause then it would have been imo a perfect game. for me just the fact that i got into that position is really cool for me - so i thought id share it. but hey, if u wanna rain on my parade - its ok.

Sorry, I didn't mean to be a t**t, it just seemed little odd. You're right, though, you did play well up to the mate sequence.