Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Napoleon's Bonaparte Chess


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1

    sasha2

    For all of you that didn't know, Napleon Bonaparte was an avid chessplayer. However, sadly only three games are left that we know (think) are his. Here is one game when the Emperor of France demolishes his opponents (in chess!).

    What do you think about this game?
  • 3 years ago · Quote · #2

    jpoom2

    Wow, I had heard he was a chessplayer, but I didn't know he was good.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #3

    sasha2

    jpoom2 wrote:

    Wow, I had heard he was a chessplayer, but I didn't know he was good.


     That was before you saw his second game Smile...

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #4

    xuranchen

    wow, he saw ahead.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #5

    jpoom2

    Do you have the second game?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #6

    sasha2

    Here's the second game,

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #7

    sasha2

    So what do you think about Napoleon I- what level of play do you think he had?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #8

    pablo29sept

    The automaton isn't the Russian czar Alexander I or the duke of Wellington?Cool

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #9

    sasha2

    pablo29sept wrote:

    The automaton isn't the Russian czar Alexander I or the duke of Wellington?


     http://www.chesscorner.com/games/fascinating/int11.htm

    For those too lazy to click on the link (like me), the automaton was a box that played chess. It was not a robot- someone inside did the moves. It was also called The Turk.

    Hope that answered your question.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #10

    RazaAdeel

    ‘Napoleon was a persistent but a very weak player. Three games purporting to be played by him are in existence. One of these (a Scotch Game) said to have been played in St Helena between Napoleon and Bertrand, and first printed in Capt. Kennedy’s Reminiscences in the Life of Aug. Fitzsnob (Waifs and Strays, 1862), is certainly fictitious. The second game, said to have been played with Mme von Rémusat, 29 March 1804, and a third game (I.L.N., 1844, 352), played against the Automaton in Vienna, are also of very doubtful authenticity.’ from H.J.R. Murray’s A History of Chess.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #11

    AnthonyCG

    He also played in the romantic era so you had to attack back then.
  • 3 years ago · Quote · #12

    jgregory59025

    his level of play is hard to tell with such a strong first game but a weak second one

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #13

    tarikhk

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago · Quote · #14

    Paul_Morphy0

    Napoleon tore his Bonaparte at Waterloo!


Back to Top

Post your reply: