Read Before You Post

Do you have similar records and supporting evidence for all kids playing on chess.com? Watch out for Interpol :p

Well I definitely did not post that.... I have had some account problems in the past, but they are being taken care of and I don't seem to be having anymore. Im no 1988 lol, but I still am estimated at 2000. Why don't you challenge me Goldendog though. I think it would be a fun game.

Somehow chess mastery is really close when you're 13 years old and one of your ratings has passed the magical 1300 barrier

Status:   Drew vs a 1700 OTB :) (37 hours ago)

Do you see why you have a credibility problem?

Also, did you notice that in that year-old thread you tell the critics to "chill," which is the same phrase you used in the thread you deleted as well as notes to others on the occasions your rating was being questioned?

You really do have a problem with telling the truth.

I hope you grow out of this crap. It will not serve you well.

Hey, don't hate on the status, if your rating goes up from drawing a 1700, then so be it. It is still a good result :P What would you estimate yourself as Heinzie?

I'm a solid 1600

I really think you guys are all underestimating yourselves here... Maybe I'm wrong, but idk. My friend here is an 1800 OTB, and he is only a 1650 in correspondence.

Too much talk, too little show

for one thing, there is no ways that you can compare chess.com's rating to the uscf rating nor the fide rating even the elo rating !  period.  Standard live chess maybe come close to the otb rating but still not even close enough. 

Its pretty funny how this thing went from a game showcase (looking for analysis) to personal criticism. Well standard live chess is pretty much the exact same thing as tournament level games. People play 15 min or longer. I think they should have a tournament time control with 45 min or longer, for best accuracy, because 15 min is still not long enough for a good accuracy. Also, you have to factor in the fact that people play at their personal best in a tournament setting.  

this is from your coach profile, correct ?

"Qualifications: I have been playing chess for 11 years. Specifically, I have been competing for 6 years. I am approximately 2000 USCF (expert level). NOTE: This is estimated and not an official rating. I have won over 30 tournaments in Rhode Island, making me one of the top players in my state for my age group. ....."

in red is false. noticed in your uscf you've been playing since 2008 that make it 4 years not 6 as you claim.

This thread has convinced me to become a chess coach! I shall offer these lessons:

1. How to lose in 15 moves or less

2. How to completely confuse your opponent by opening with g4

3. Why you should resign after 4 moves

4. How to extend a losing streak  

5. And, my specialty, How to really screw up by playing after too many drinks!

I'll make sure the rates are fair. And, all of my coaching is backed up with my history here! I'm certain I will be able to offer even more services in the future!

What do you think?

how much you are changing ?

Sounds good to me - what are you drinking?

yes I read after the red part, 650 rating difference, is telling porky. 

you an expert yeah? then how come you still lose or draw with an 1300 or so players ?

tournament (Oct. 2011)

W1321 D1432 W1368 L1378