rockin' the richter-rauzer

Jump to forum:
 
28th September 2009, 07:12pm
#1
by shuttlechess92
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1948
28th September 2009, 07:31pm
#2
by xLoserx
Trondheim Norway
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 69

The ending was indeed very nice! But I think black should have played against getting in d5 at some point.

28th September 2009, 07:43pm
#3
by m74m2008
Spencer, IN United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 587

Wow, that was simply overwhelming. I also am a bit overwhelmed by the extensive number of variations that you put in there. Very nicely done, all around!

28th September 2009, 07:44pm
#4
by shuttlechess92
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1948

yeah, but that was the problem with the premature e5. after that the d5 square was completely in white's hands.

28th September 2009, 07:44pm
#5
by RyanMK
Iowa United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 2277

I'm going to get here before King and say this: "Pickles"

28th September 2009, 07:45pm
#6
by shuttlechess92
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1948

lol. @m74m2008 those variations were rybka. but the annotations were of course me. Thus I can't say if my comments during the game were completely true, but I decided to leave some of the opening sidelines put in by rybka just for the reader's enjoyment.

 

- should they enjoy the richter rauzer =)

 

shuttlechess92

28th September 2009, 07:53pm
#7
by SerbianChessStar
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2629
RyanMK wrote:

I'm going to get here before King and say this: "Pickles"


 thanks f'in god.. i dont want to hear that nerd say pickles..

Very nice analysis.. i was very surprised at how much analysis you put on this game.

28th September 2009, 08:00pm
#8
by shuttlechess92
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1948
SerbianChessStar wrote:

 thanks f'in god.. i dont want to hear that nerd say pickles..

Very nice analysis.. i was very surprised at how much analysis you put on this game.


thanks but the analysis is rybka's. I just did the main line (played the game) and added the annotations. to be honest I haven't really examined the analysis yet. but thanks for the comment! =)

28th September 2009, 08:48pm
#9
by SerbianChessStar
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2629

how can it auto put analysis for you?

dont you have to write all the analysis lines or you get the PGN?

28th September 2009, 08:53pm
#10
by shuttlechess92
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1948
SerbianChessStar wrote:

how can it auto put analysis for you?

dont you have to write all the analysis lines or you get the PGN?


my rybka has something called "game analysis" where it inserts the "right" opening lines (where a novelty is played), as well as where blunders/ inaccuracies are made (and it puts in the correct variation).

 

very much like chess.com's computer!

28th September 2009, 09:02pm
#11
by padman
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 384

damn nice finishing moves. The g pawn was the hero of the hour!

This belongs in the Tactics trainer database, no doubt.

28th September 2009, 09:05pm
#12
by shuttlechess92
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1948

=P

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.