15234 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So, I played this cold game. Many mistakes, but normal for 5/0.
Nice win. I always enjoy playing through your games - thanks for posting them.
I've grown quite fond of the Scandinavian defence but prefer Qd7 or Qa5 rather than Qd8, I am quite impatient at times and love a more attacking/aggressive approach and tend to opt for Qa5.
In my amateur experience, I've always played decently and achieved equality if not great attacking potential when playing the Scandi at any time parameter less than or equal to 10|0, I've also suffered embarrassing losses at "standard" time limits andand more importantly never won a game at this level when I have responded 1. D5 to e4, pretty much exposing my lack in theory of the Scandi, then again in comparison to other opening theories, there isn't much what I consider a "wealthy plethora of lines to the Scandinavian accepted" but also why I was attracted to the opening response in the first place.. relatively easy opening to learn say rather than the Queens Gambit Declined or Caro Kann. I may be mistaken, but I wonder if you feel the limited main lines available is sufficient? Would you rather have a plethora of lines to play ? I find that obscure responses from white tends to throw me off my game.
Thanks for sharing, fun game to watch.
Kiwi, I never play the Center-Counter or the Scandinavian Defense, but i play against it a lot as White. As a rule, I don't have much problem with the opening and usually go into middle game equal or better. This game was an exception due to my blunder on move 10. I really posted this game because of my stupid mistake and the fact that such a mistake wasn't exploited, even though my opponent's rating was about 250 pts above my own. People need to play vigorously when they gain an large advantage. I didn't force the mate, but I think my opponent got lost in the haze (as I almost did).
The old scool of Morphy is still strong! :)
waking back up, hehe, nice.
"2nd Gashimov Memorial, Round 2 - Hosts: GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko & GM Nijat Abasov"
by kleelof 5 minutes ago
4/18/2015 - Tactics In The Distance
by Dadnavy71 12 minutes ago
For Sale-Fantastic Deal For Someone !
by ROBB_CHESS 13 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Plus (PPP) - "Kasparov - Short 2015"
by awesomechess1729 14 minutes ago
by AngusTheFirst 18 minutes ago
Losing the bishop on purpose for no gain?
by ningyuan 28 minutes ago
Not resigning - lose on time
by TerraPi 28 minutes ago
What is the point of even trying to be a GM *if*...
by XDave121X 31 minutes ago
12/2/2014 - The Center
by keb2012 32 minutes ago
Do you think chess and mathematics are related?
by DrSpudnik 35 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!