15601 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I recently finished the following game, in which I think neither player made any gross error until the end. Even before black's final move, computer analysis gives white an advantage of over 3 points (with a material advantage of only one point). So where did black go wrong?
As you said, 7...dxc4 was a mistake. Nbd7 and b6 would both be better. I don't think 13...cxd5 is as good as Nc5. 18...Ng5 looks inaccurate as well. Nf6 and even Nd6 look better. Black takes way too long to mobilize the queenside and pays for it.
20 Nxf7! Kxf7 21 f5 and game over!
black had no knowledge of the opening whatsoever. cxd5 is a game losing error. Bb3 is bad cause of 13. Nc5 and then you have a bad bishop on c2 obstructing your rook file
my advice: stick to e4 till you're 2500
Not quite game over: chess.com computer analysis gives the line 20. Nxf7 Kxf7 21. f5 Re8 22. fxe6+ Bxe6 23. Bxe6+ Rxe6 24. Rc7+ Kf6 25. Rxe6+ Kxe6 26. Rxg7 Rd8 27. Rxb7 Rd2 28. Rxh7 Rxb2 29. Rxa7 with a three pawn lead into the endgame. It gives 20. f5? a question mark because it doesn't seem to find 21. Bxf7, which gives a better result than the suggested 21. Bd5. Then again, since I don't have a membership, the analysis depth is lesser compared to Shredder.
As for cxd5, I wouldn't call it game-losing: it's worth only one point according to computer analysis, and I was up by three points by move 32.
And why would I stick to e4 when I'm much more familiar with d4?
Nice game only one mistake in the ned that is 32. Rg6! and mate in 2 after Rh7 and Rh8 mate
Wow that was an amazing game. I am a pure queen's gambit player and I felt like a learnt a lot from this. Keep up the good work :D
13. d5 gets a double exclam? Really?
Yeah, even the computer seems to think that it was an inaccuracy. Let me change it to !?...
7/25/2014 - Sahovic - Karolyi 1986
by milray101 6 minutes ago
Position in the Dragon Sicilian
by WhatIsThisHereNow 7 minutes ago
Only a 40 year break...
by mroyer 7 minutes ago
a query about kga
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 12 minutes ago
How to analysis game on chromebook
by notmtwain 16 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by ponz111 16 minutes ago
Does anyone play rated bullet here?
by duck29 19 minutes ago
What could I of done better (1100 10 min)
by soothsayer8 35 minutes ago
Time Control Changes?
by keeganomahoney 36 minutes ago
observe the diagram
by donopo 39 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!