10623 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The diagram is still not working...
It goes: 1. Nf3 d5 2. c4 (the Reti Gambit) cxd4 3. e3 b5? 4. a4! c6 5. axb5 cxb5 6. Nc6 Qb6
Black's position is hopeless...
Man, I wish my knights jumped from f3 to c6.
I meant 6. Nc3. No need to be a prick.
You are the one who posted the typo, I have the right to question or point it out. No need to be snappy.
You didn't just point it out. You were an ass about it.
And people call me a troll...
The point is that 3. b5? in the Reti Gambit is a bad move.
The Reti gambit happens in the french actually.
After 1.e4 e6 2.b3, this is the Reti gambit.
What I think you mean is that 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3, and here b5 deserves the supposed "?", and rightfully so. White has many ways of approaching this position.
Or in yereslov's words: "6.Nc3 nor 6.b3 does not refute black's setup"
Troll only to be trolled
And who's the troll here?
Your sentence seems choppy. What are you trying to say?
I thought you would know. Anyhow, I am untracking. Good day.
If you're saying that 6. Nc3! is not a refutation, then I must disagree.
I dont know. It seems like you're saying that 6. Nc3 or 6. b3 is not a refutation, but that doesn't make any positional sense.
thanks for the info, will try to keep that in mind. I don't often get takers when offering pawns, though.
The Reti Gambit happpens after 1. Nf3 d5 2. c4.
You can look at any opening database.
At the start it is the Reti, regardless of what it transposes into.
So 1. f4 e5 2. e4 is not a Kings Gambit, but Birds Opening?
against 1...Nc6 there are many tries...2.e4, 2.c4, 2.b3, 2.g3 like you played, but i like the simplest 2.d4 going into a chigoriin...
Agreed. I mated a 1963-rated player in fifteen move in that line (1. Nf3 Nc6 2. d4 transposing to a Chigorin)
It's a better version. The mainline is pretty much refuted.
10/2/2014 - Judit Polgar - Artashes Minasian, Batumi, 1999
by charley400 3 minutes ago
10/1/2014 - Mate in 3 Again
by mmwanjeya 20 minutes ago
Is the Fried Liver Attack good for white?
by harshi_n 24 minutes ago
Stop with solving tactics ??
by VanCamal 30 minutes ago
Latvian gambit rescue ?
by uh-ohh 76 minutes ago
Windows Phone 8 Beta Testers Needed
by sergrnz 99 minutes ago
by ghostofmaroczy 2 hours ago
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by edmundich 2 hours ago
[COMPLiMENTS]: Blocking players after they leave 1 nice note on your wall?
by RonaldJosephCote 2 hours ago
9/1/2014 - Mate in 2
by sato_au 3 hours ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!