Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

two rooks, queen, bishop and...zugzwang ?!

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1


    I'm not really proud of the game as I was slightly behind in the opening while I was playing the Nimzo-Indian which I know relatively well. I slowly got uphill with a little help from my opponent (no clear mistake, but many inaccuracies).

    The position reached on move 28 (hence the title) is really amazing, it reminds me of a game from Alekhine with a pin given by a battery of two rooks.


    The white pieces are incapable to move there !



  • 4 years ago · Quote · #2


    It's not zugzwang until EVERY move loses. You have plenty of pawn moves.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #3


    After 30... Qxf5+ what's wrong with 31. Qf3 (instead of 31. Rf3) ?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #4


    good game...

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #5


    BlueKnightShade wrote:

    After 30... Qxf5+ what's wrong with 31. Qf3 (instead of 31. Rf3) ?

    Indeed, it seems way better... Both my opponent and I overloked this, apparently !

    Maybe my opponent actually thought I was more likely to miss a tactical line than to misevaluate or poorly play a pawn endgame. But as for me, I missed it (otherwise I would have added it to the analysis).


    Black trades everything and still wins the pawn endgame with some care. But for sure it is better than losing a rook.

Back to Top

Post your reply: