17136 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I believe my knight sac was unsound however I was able to pull out a win, mostly due to some poor defense by my opponent. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks!
How unsound was the sac and was there anything else to learn from in the rest of the game? Was it a ?? or just a ?!
It was a total hang.
Honestly I think you'd need a computer to analyze after move 11 or 12. Unless the higher rated players here would care to offer a move for white that would destroy your position.
A sac like that needs something much more immediate as a followup.
Your sac is devoid of merit.
Had you been playing decent opponent they would have returned the piece immediately with Bxf4 and you would have been forced to castle-long.
if you look at the position at move 9 or 10, it's obvious that black doesn't even have the shadow of an attack.
only because you want to attack, that doesn't mean you have the means to do so.
and you really got the wrong idea of Qf6+. retaking with the h pawn would not "destroy your structure", but instead would allow you to use your h-rook. E.g. 13.Rf1 would not have been possible if you opened the h file.
This was completely unsound. Better was 10...Nxd5 which took a pawn and discovered attack on Nh4.
Are you aware thtat 24...Rg3?? was a terrible blunder? Somehow white did not see that 25.Qxg3 would simply win a rook in addition to the piece...
I'm sorry, but why would they have returned the piece? There's no reason to do so, the attack isn't going anywhere.
The attack is too slow. White shouldn't have played 17. h4 - instead white should have thrown the queenside pawns at black. Black's bishop is a bad bishop and black lacks control of the light squares. White should be able to attack on the queenside and defend the kingside with a block on the light squares.
Generally is good principle to do so if under attack yourself. Agreed in this case not necessary
The knight sac was unsound, although it seems you could have gotten some compensation for it, more than what you got in the game.
Grabbing pawns in the opening can be risky, but in this case 4. Nxe4, you're grabbing a central pawn and I don't see anything wrong with it. After all a pawn is a pawn, and winning a central pawn is important so I don't see anything wrong with this move.
6. I don't know why white didn't regain his pawn with Nxe5.
7. Bf5? is a mistake. Why not just move the knight back to c5 with tempo on white's bishop? After white played Nh4, why not just play g6 holding onto the bishop. Plus white had a better move than Nh4, Qc2 and now there's alot of pressure on your pinned knight.
on move 10 why not Nxd5. You will atleast get a 3rd pawn for your piece and white will have to castle by hand. At this point in the game I would still rather have the piece but you will atleast have a little more compensation than what you had in the game. These are the things you need to calculate if you are able to before you even make the sacrifice. You can't just sac a piece because it looks good exposing the king. If you dont see a good follow up, or a good way to get compensation for it then you shouldn't do it.
I really like you to share content, thank you and hope there will be more exchanges.I think what you say is right, I support you.This is my website:crimped wire
"Gibraltar Chess Festival! Round 1 - Hosts IM Elisabeth Paehtz & GM Simon Williams"
I have nobody blocked...
by NKorea-2014 3 minutes ago
I finally learned how to study tactics right and finally improved my rating
by Uhohspaghettio1 7 minutes ago
by bagahc 7 minutes ago
Sacrificing knight for 2 pawns
by chessmicky 9 minutes ago
Secrets of a strong troll 2
by Chess_Troller 12 minutes ago
am i a prodigy?
by goingforyourqueen 12 minutes ago
Just a reminder...
by blitzjoker 13 minutes ago
Login through email
by Yelenasach 16 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by Rambo2004 16 minutes ago
1/27/2015 - Boris Spassky vs Arnulf Westermeier, Germany, 1982
by FredBatchelor 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!