13344 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I played a 5/0 game using what I found later to be called the Von Beivorseen var. of the Reversed Chigorin Defense. I'd never played this before. I don't even remember seeing any games with this opening. I played the opening moves to make the game interesting and non-book (though apparently it is book). My opponent was somewhat higher rated, but in spite of obvious mistakes and missed opportunities on my part, his play was weaker. I made some notes as I was playing back through the game:
Are my notes too deep?
Okay, this comment pushed the right buttons. ;) This is a very uncommon line I confess I have no knowledge of. But some things I noticed:
- As you yourself mentioned, his 7.Nb5 was a big mistake of course because of 8...d4! But what was the rationale behind your own 6...d5? Did you hope he’d play 7.cxd e.p.? I think 7... Nh5 8.Bh2 Bxc3 9.bxc3 Qa5 10.Qd2 exd 11.e3 would have been rather more promising for White then for Black.
- 9...d4 seems not only one move late, but also by this time not the best option anymore. I think grabbing the pawn (9...Qxc5) would have been mandatory.
- But he in turn should have played 10.Ne4 because this would have prevented you from grabbing the pawn one move later (which alas you didn’t do anyway ;))
- I don’t see the reason why he played 12.c3, and here I would have just taken the pawn, exchange bishops and get the queen back to a5 (evening out material again eventually).
- His 16.Bb4?? was a big blunder because of 16...e3!! - as again you yourself noticed in the aftermath. It’s a pity, but of course this was a 5 minute game - something I am notoriously bad at, and I’m sure I already would have lost on time at that point ... ;)
- After his 20.Rb1 the game is just basically over, so I stopped looking further there.
Okay, this comment pushed the right buttons. ;)
Then it worked!
No, what I saw was that I had missed 5...d4 and went ahead and played it as a knee-jerk response. After I made it, I wasn't particularly bothered by it and actually felt the advanced pawn might come in handy. But there seems to be a lesson here on chosing one's moves.
Probably his own knee-jerk reaction...
I think 16.Bb4 was a lousy move too. His game seemedto go downhill from there.
Then you missed me missing mate-in-1!
Thanks for the notes!
Bought:Fischer's "My 60 Memorable Games"
by InoYamanaka a few minutes ago
5/22/2013 - Good Night to the Enemy
by Master_Valek a few minutes ago
Gutless cowards who win and run
by freebird316 a few minutes ago
by PLAVIN79 2 minutes ago
by Master_Valek 4 minutes ago
Reyner - Steinitz, 1860
by gimmewuchagot 4 minutes ago
Is it possible that there are psychic chess masters
by Master_Valek 5 minutes ago
Opponent not moving
by tliu1222 6 minutes ago
Will technology ruin the game of chess?
by PLAVIN79 7 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com