Try using Computer Analysis.
Yeah, you really had him on the defensive. He seemed very nervous.
Unfortunately, I'm out of computer analysis this week.
I think White would've had a good chance to save the game with 30 Nxg5.
I see what you are saying, though I would probably end up a queen ahead (If I am looking at this correctly.) I am not very good at analysis though, so I am probably wrong.
The point is that White can possibly get perpetual check (or a new queen himself) after say 1... b3 2 Nxf7 (or possibly even 2 Ne6+ fe 3 g5)...all because your two pieces are too far away to easily come to your king's aid.
I see that. Thanks for your analysis. :) I am glad he didn't do that, as I wouldn't know how to respond.
NM Tony, white had already won.
What do you mean eXecute?
White won the game .. Black made a huge blunder with move 33... and that's all you put in your diagram.
Oh, no, White resigned at that point. Sorry I didn't say that. But now you have me intrigued - why was move 33 a huge blunder?
Let me show you.
You could win, but you would need time, maybe the other guy was low on time? In such situation, I think KNIGHT is more valuable.
Your diagram is wrong eXecute. After queen takes, white hangs the knight.
Yeah, that was the plan.
execute black can take the knight and the queens can stay on the board. that option puts black ahead...
????????????????????????????????????
Are you some sort of stalker, posting spam in all of my recent topics?
Yep, thats me!!!!!!!! Hahaha!!!!
I'm not going to get into an argument about this.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.