8808 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Phiman252
I really don't see the purpose in it.
Akuni
Because people are dumb
RosarioVampire
it's not unplayable in 1 or 2 minute games, if followed by 3...Qe7.
Ian_Sinclair
It's played because they believe the (f6) pawn will protect the (e) pawn and be a solid position. Of course this is a beginners mistake to think that, these day no decent chess player would dare take the risk of playing it unless maybe if they are dealing with beginners.
likesforests
Phiman252> I really don't see the purpose in it.
Beginners play it because the f-pawn defends the e-pawn. They're surprised by the sac and quickly lose as per the game above.
More advanced players use it as a surprise weapon because their opponents are unlikely to know any theory beyond Nxe5. That gives a player who knows its theory good chances of drawing at the master level, and good chances of winning at the amateur level. Especially when your opponent underestimates you because of your opening!
RosarioVampire> it's not unplayable in 1 or 2 minute games, if followed by 3...Qe7.
It's playable even at 45 minutes / game. Fischer was unable to break down the defense. Chigorin played it and lived to tell the tale. Class A and below players have lost.
Scarjo was brave enough to try it at correspondence time controls.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/damiano-defense-leads-to-victory
Likeforest have u got an example of a game that was drawn at the master level using this opening defence?
Here are the two master-level draws that I mentioned:
...
And a couple more interesting games:
Don't get me wrong. I am not saying to switch to it. I do not plan to play this defense! At the same time, practical examples demonstrate it's not as simple to break down as many believe after watching the refutation of one or two lines in a book or youtube video.
bondiggity
Don't get me wrong. I am not saying to switch to it. I do not plan to play this defense! At the same time, it's not as fragile as many are lead to believe after seeing Damiano's refutation of it in a book or youtube video.
Yes, to say that Damiano is an auto-mate in 11 or whatever is obviously wrong. However if 3...Qe7 4. Nc4, I think you can safely say white has an extremely comfortable position, and has gotten way too much advantage out of the opening.
theking16
yup i agree
bondiggity, precisely.
gdal_muriel
That Thaler vs Sloan game is embarassing to watch. White played extremely poorly.
second_wind
Yes, white really blew his winning chances there...
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by Helzeth a few minutes ago
How to improve chess at faster rate
by saieshborkar a few minutes ago
computer analysis rating
by hominoid 3 minutes ago
Good Game? My rating?
Being restricted
by kr3utter 5 minutes ago
Have your chess skills helped you in real life?
by dhale72 6 minutes ago
Program that calculates rating by analyzing your games?
by hominoid 6 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by garrthog 13 minutes ago
''Gift from Viswanathan Anand''
by Aditya_Deshpande8 14 minutes ago
WOW... this is a first
by upsign 14 minutes ago