16003 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
At first thought the attack was unsound after rxd4!? (initially after the game analysis) But, apparently I am still ahead after further analysis.
wow nice man analyzing others games really is helpful =)
glad I gave someone else the bug..I think one of the greatest thing about it is you get to see positions which you wouldn't normally put/get yourself in. So forces you to think more concretely.
Wow, strange...14...d5 seems to be better for black. Strange that I didn't even see that move
In your alternate line (14. ... Rxd4), after 20. Rb8 Qxg5 isn't Black winning?
oh, i saw chesscube, and i left
apparently u didn't
22. Qf2 looks a bad choice in your for instance. Why not Nxe6+?
Yes, yes it is.
I did find a win for black much earlier in that line though lol
I wonder if chesscube ratings are still inflated. When I used to play there, the 2200s were about the same as 1900s here.
I am guessing you never played in the warzone final. A lot of 1700's will play like masters...Wonder why that could be?
It was a good year ago when I played there. I won quite a few blitz tournaments, but I hated the bullet ones because I'd never win fast enough to score the most points by the deadline.
But anyway, the ratings were terribly inflated. I found I could beat players rated as high as 2400 in blitz there, which is something I can't do here.
Well people start at 1500 there and 1200 here so it makes sense for the ratings to be 300 points higher.
Not true scott...it is 1200 (at least when I started there). Unfortunately I can't get to chesscube atm, for some reason, to confirm.
Anyone else having that problem now?
Don't argue if you don't know. I started at 1500 like 2 weeks ago.
I know I started at 1200...So don't argue if you don' t pay attention
You said not true, and it is true. People do start at 1500 there. So I'm free to argue. What you (think you) started at is irrelevant to say 'it is', maybe 'it was' would be relevant. I'm paying perfect attention thanks, don't try to be clever when you incorrectly argued against my fact.
Yeah I think it's about 300 points, I'm 1800 here 2100 there in blitz.
NOt true again..So quit trying to be patronizing]
Indeed, Chesscube ratings are inflated as they all start at 1500 not like here at 1200.
White sacs a knight on move 3 and wins against a player with a rating of 3141
by pfren a few minutes ago
White sacs a knight on move 3 and wins a player with a rating of 3141 part 2
by mittensthebunny 4 minutes ago
4/18/2014 - Steinikov - Jaskoy, USSR 1988
by vijay_sena_reddy 8 minutes ago
I lasted 30 Moves against an NM!
by LazyChessPlayer3201 9 minutes ago
Avoid House of Staunton!
by Whalstib 9 minutes ago
What do you feel about players that do perpetual checks when they are losing?
by Mike_Logan 14 minutes ago
Please tell me how I did.
by LazyChessPlayer3201 16 minutes ago
Bullet & Blitz: Is it shame to play for time-control win?
by 2200ismygoal 21 minutes ago
*Mangus Carlsen's moves*
by hsong1 22 minutes ago
LCP Chess lessons Part 3: Tactics
by LazyChessPlayer3201 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!