i wonder why my oppennent resign in this case?please give me some resson and opinian...

thanks a lot.

Your opponent (who played Black) didn't resign, he ran out of time. He was completely dominating, especially after Bd8, so this was sorta a silly win for you.

did i has any change to win in this game??...with less value??

No, I don't see any reasonable way you could have won or drawn if the game were played out to its logical conclusion. Your opponent would have to make many mistakes.

looks like a time thing for me!!

any one have some example of end game with less piece plese post here for me,i need it...to improve my self...

thanks

God2 wrote:

any one have some example of end game with less piece plese post here for me,i need it...to improve my self...

thanks

---

attention on this comment!!who post for me,i give the trophy...please...

God2> example of end game with less piece plese

 

Here is a recent example. I'm up a piece beginning from move six, and we reach an endgame after move fourteen.

kaos2008 wrote: looks like a time thing for me!!

---

??what did u try to prove?

i wonder wher can i found the "one pawn enought"?

ok,everyone...i show an example for u..

then...please show your...

Nice puzzle God2!

any other example game end and win by the less piece one?

what about this

WCFG just post a very good example!!thanks,any other?

god2 i think there was a way u could have won u need ot put hyour rook on a1 and pin down his knight  then it wouldnt realy matter what he did he would be died, or u gould have add the rook to help your queen and other rook