I couldn't figure out what you meant by the comment after 19 Qd3. "I am very proud of myself for being able to see this move..."
I finally realized that it reflected your thoughts about 19..Re3.
I couldn't figure out what you meant by the comment after 19 Qd3. "I am very proud of myself for being able to see this move..."
I finally realized that it reflected your thoughts about 19..Re3.
I couldn't figure out what you meant by the comment after 19 Qd3. "I am very proud of myself for being able to see this move..."
I finally realized that it reflected your thoughts about 19..Re3.
thanks for sharing, sherlock
1600 players are annoying to meet
i must've played a good game then, huh, tough guy? I made that comment because he made a useless comment about my notation. He was confused about my notation and then he figured it out. Thanks for sharing. I really wanted to know that.
1600 players are annoying to meet
i must've played a good game then, huh, tough guy? I made that comment because he made a useless comment about my notation. He was confused about my notation and then he figured it out. Thanks for sharing. I really wanted to know that.
Since your previous 6 comments were made after a move, one might have expected that the next comment would follow the same pattern, unless there was a hint, such as "The following move...."
/I understand that English is not your native language. I was just trying to help.
1600 players are annoying to meet
i must've played a good game then, huh, tough guy? I made that comment because he made a useless comment about my notation. He was confused about my notation and then he figured it out. Thanks for sharing. I really wanted to know that.
I understand that English is not your native language. I was just trying to help.
lol piss off
What comments do you expect in this thread? You aren't asking for advice, or asking a question.
u freak dont post in my threads idiot
What comments do you expect in this thread? You aren't asking for advice, or asking a question.
u block me but u post in my threads LOL. Ok u want to keep talking little man or what
What I don't get is why you guys post in this crap thread and complain about it when there's other, much better threads here:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/who-is-the-best-chess-player-of-all-time
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/complaints-unanswered-on-chesscom
brilliant thread, crap responses, including yours. it's obvious you need to draw attention to your baby threads by advertising on a MAN's thread. I hope you get the attention you require, little guy.
Despite your stinking attitude re3 is a sweet shot.
thanks for actually commenting on my game and appreciating the move
my attitude is fine, the very first response in my thread made absolute no comment on my moves, the game, it was an asinine comment about how i notated the game. The guy figured it out but somehow thinks he should post about his struggles with the notations rather than actually commenting on my game.
Then we got tweedle dum thinking he's the man talking about my rating, then the first guy just keeps talking about the notation again, saying nothing about the game. And then the biggest dork of all time actually hunts my thread down, after he blocked me, to troll on my thread. You actually commented on the game and my move which i appreciate but then guy after you advertises on my thread to boost his baby threads LOL.
hot damm , obviously ur oponent was not playing strategic by playing queen side pawn moves on the opening and not following with breaks, so ur rather lucky to find and oponent so passive. btw rook sac not great since u only had a pawn a queen attakin, if he no blunder dat kinside draw is unnavoidable
He is a troll. Or a very self-centered person.
i'll let you keep posting on my threads, little man. It's obvious you need the attention. You blocked me but keep posting on my thread, hilarious. Ok, little boy, post away.
not even gonna read all that stuff Migilla all i know is that you were desperate to advertise your threads on MY thread and for some reason are butthurt that i called u out on it lol.
hot damm , obviously ur oponent was not playing strategic by playing queen side pawn moves on the opening and not following with breaks, so ur rather lucky to find and oponent so passive. btw rook sac not great since u only had a pawn a queen attakin, if he no blunder dat kinside draw is unnavoidable
everyone is lucky to find an opponent that may be weaker than them or play poorly, that's not saying much. And actually, the rook sac is great lol. Please post a alternative move and line that i should have played. I analyzed it only with the chess.com game analysis but unless you can come up with a strong engine analysis or alternative line, i think you are mistaken.
But i remember the chess.com analysis saying that the rook sac did lead to a draw but it still being the best move, so i think you are right about saying it leads to a draw. if i didn't play that rook move tho i would just lose the game.
He is a troll. Or a very self-centered person.
i'll let you keep posting on my threads, little man. It's obvious you need the attention. You blocked me but keep posting on my thread, hilarious. Ok, little boy, post away.
I blocked you because I know that all you will do is troll. I post in your threads because I want to raise awareness too the fact that you are a troll.
EDIT: This is actually most likely some little kid.
pretty happy with this 10 minute game i just played. glad i found a cool rook sac. i basically just wreck his kingside, at one point i figure it will end up being a perpetual check but he couldn't handle the pressure ;)